Dick's Choice of AOL and Yahoo
contributors comments on spelledoutdate SIGN UP FOR, OR REMOVE YOURSELF FROM Dick's
Reports DISTRIBUTION AT
mglennbeckrules@aol.com
or respond to this email
The Senate health-care
bill is not the only monstrosity that died in Massachusetts on
Jan. 19.
Two
days after the Massachusetts victory of Republican Scott Brown,
Speaker Pelosi announced that she does not have the votes to
push the Senate health-care bill through the
House
. A similar message is being
delivered more quietly to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus:
There will never be enough votes in 2010 to push the amnesty
bill.
To all but a few
diehard zealots, the amnesty bill is dead. The nation can now
move to an honest debate on true immigration reform.
Of course, a few
tone-deaf
politicians are still laboring in back rooms of the Capitol to
negotiate a "bipartisan compromise" that includes amnesty. Memo
to Lindsay Graham and Chuck Schumer: The party's over. Move on.
Thus in 2010, given
that the liberals do not have the votes for a comprehensive
amnesty bill, the Obama
administration
will use various stealth amnesty
laws already on the books. For example, last week, Obama used
current law to grant Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, to
200,000 illegal-alien Haitians. These are not earthquake
victims, not orphans and not refugees, but now, they are future
citizens.
Those 200,000
Haitians are now future citizens because the 18-month time limit
will be renewed again and again until they eventually attain
permanent status. Who would want to go
home
to corruption-plagued Haiti after
getting legal status in the United States?
To be fair, the
abuse of the TPS program didn't begin with Obama; it has been
going on for years. It is one more example of the need for
reform of current immigration laws.
Stopping a new amnesty is
not enough. We need a reform agenda that can bring some
coherence and sanity to our immigration system and bring it into
harmony with other national goals, including national-security
imperatives.
Many good reform
proposals have been introduced in Congress in recent years, but
few have been allowed to come to a vote. Typically, when a good
bill does get passed, it is then sabotaged by denying it
adequate
funding. This
happened to the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, which
reimburses local communities the costs of incarcerating illegal
aliens, and it happened to the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which
mandated 700 miles of double fencing on the southwest border.
A comprehensive
enforcement strategy is offered by Rep. Heath Shuler's H.R.3308,
the Secure America through Verification and Enforcement Act,
which now has 104 cosponsors. The comparable Senate bill is
S.1505. The bill sets concrete goals and standards for border
security and enhanced interior enforcement. A key element is the
permanent reauthorization of the E-verify program for employment
verification.
More fencing and
additional Border Patrol agents will not be sufficient to
protect America because every one of our international airports
is part of our border. Over 140 million international travelers
passed through our 20 busiest international airports in 2008.
Foreign students from the Middle East are bringing their wives
and girlfriends here to have their babies in American hospitals,
children who become instant American citizens and "anchors" for
their parents' future green-card
applications
.
Dozens of immigration
reforms are needed, but a few are especially urgent:
Rep.
Nathan Deal is the principal author of H.R.1868, which repeals
"birthright citizenship" by limiting citizenship to children born of
citizens and legal permanent residents, not tourists, foreign
students, temporary workers or illegal aliens.
Rep. Gringrey's H.R.878 would end chain migration by limiting the
relatives who qualify for "family reunification" to only immediate
family members.
Rep. Goodlatte's bill, H.R.2305, will end the "diversity lottery"
through which 55,000 green cards are awarded annually to people who
are exempt from sponsorship and
job-skill
requirements.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn's H.R.2406 will strengthen local law
enforcement's role in immigration enforcement, for example in
extending the reach of 287(g) agreements between local police and
the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.
Finally, we need an
immediate three-year moratorium on all immigration. The moratorium
would allow our beleaguered immigration and law-enforcement agencies
to clear huge backlogs, investigate and resolve thousands of fraud
cases,
discharge
and replace corrupt officials and
upgrade management systems. It would also allow time for a thorough
re-evaluation of our entire naturalization process and the means by
which new immigrants are assimilated into American society.
This is an ambitious
reform agenda, but our corrupt and dysfunctional immigration system
cries out for wholesale reform. We can now move beyond the debate
over amnesty and start talking about how to fix real problems. Tom Tancredo
is a former five-term congressman from Colorado and 2008 candidate
for the Republican presidential nomination. He currently serves as
chairman of the Rocky Mountain Foundation and co-chairman of
TeamAmericaPac. Tancredo is the author of
"In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America's Border and Security."
I will judge your support for our state's citizens by your willingness to
support the the bipartisan Reform of Immigration through Defining Good
Enforcement Resolution, HR 1026, or BRIDGE resolution, which outlines the
key principles of immigration reform. We need this reform to make sure we
create jobs for USA citizens, and to make sure we stop using government force to
make taxpayer's subsidize people who do not belong in the USA.
I ask you to join the group of 22 congressmen who called on Congress on
Thursday to reject amnesty for illegal immigrants and enforce employment
restrictions on non-citizens. We must honor the contributions of those who have
come here legally and continue to play by the rules while punishing those that
knowingly break our laws.
To share your
thoughts and join an ongoing discussion about this click here
theadultroundtableREALLY-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Bookstore
From Lincoln to Obama.
Bookstore: Pravda
Bookstore: Religious Bookstore.
Bookstore: Russia and Pravda bookstore. Why I like
progressive democrats
Glenn Beck has informed and educated USA citizens. He has inspired
millions to rally against big government spending. He has exposed Communists
and Socialists and Tax Cheats in the White House and Congress. He has
encouraged USA voters to vote against big government statists.
Most recently he has shown the evil roots of the progressive socialism
that is destroying the USA. His documentary, shown on Friday, January 22,
2009, taught about the socialist progressives of recent history who killed 100
million with their Marxist policies.
He taught more history about these totalitarian socialists in one hour than
is taught in entire college careers.
Glenn Beck deserves the President's Civilian Medal of Honor.
White House politicizes Haiti
disaster.
In their typical - use every crisis for your advantage - Obama has even asked
people to send their donations to his White House staff - not saying how much
will actually go to Haitians. The Main Stream Media has also decided to make a
buck off these suffering victims.
Only Fox news has the courage to say "NO" Fox News merely identifies
legitimate charities who will get your donations to the Haitians,
in a
rare show of inhumanity and greed, the WhiteHouse has worked with broadcast and cable
television outlets to pre-empt their regular programming to air the
Hope For Haiti Now Global TV Telethon.
Except for Fox News Channel. Only Fox
refused to capitalize of the suffering in Haiti.
a list of channels participating:
CBS
ABC
NBC
CW
FOX
TNT
Weather Channel
MSNBC
CNBC
CNN
HBO
Showtime
Major League Baseball Network
Style Network
E! Entertainment Network
ReelzChannel
TNT
Comedy Central
Oxygen
Soap Opera channel
Bravo
National Geographic Channel
Sleuth
G4
CMT
TV1
BET
MTV
MTV2
VH1
GMC
FUSE
Current
PBS
Of course the progressive socialist elites think you must have a
"liberal" enforced education to be intelligent - which proves the socialists
elites are snobs and stupid.
Avoiding a university degree may explain why Beck was not brain washed by
leftist socialist progressive professors.
Truth is this happens ALL THE TIME in
Muslim countries - Christians (kaffir) are preyed upon and killed for
being Christian..........but you don't often read the USA or other
Western nation's media publicizing this genocide.........but let some
Muslim woman's head scarf get tugged and there are a plethora of front
page stories about Islamophobia.
Attacks on Christians are
increasing throughout the Muslim world. Where is the voice
of "moderate Muslim" outrage?...(too busy marching and screaming
about a cartoon?)
Thanks to the courageous and brilliant Pamela Geller at
Atlas Shrugs:
The Christian girl Shazia was working as
a Domestic Worker in AA 444 Defense Lahore with Muhammad Naeem
Lawyer of Lahore High Court Lahore.
He never paid a single
penny to Shazia from last 8 months.
On 21st of January 2010. Shazias Mother received a dead
body of her younger girl 13 year and was shocked then she called
some people from her neighbor and then they called mid Khalid
Shahzad G Secretary Forum of Minorities.
According to our investigation that
Shazia has raped and
torture by the Muhammad Naeem Lawyer Lahore High Court Lahore.
He tried to hide this case and also pressurize
to her father and media that I am a lawyer and will see who will
highlight this issue because the court and the lawyer community
is with me. Yesterday night he came with his relative from Pak
Army when they come to know that the deal will be not successful
then the Brigadier of the Pak Army left away. According to this
case we come to know that the elite class and the influence
people dont care about the law and order and they can use the
law as they want. Shazia
was only the source of income of her family because her two
elder sisters has been married and she was only the hope of her
young brother Sunny aged 8 years.
According to the mother of
victim Shazia and father Lawyer Mohammad Naeem offered them Rs.
20000 deal to keep this issue under ground if they shout no body
will listen and they will never get any thing. The deface Police
were also not interested to registered FIR Against Mohammad
Naeem.
Adapted from Dr.
Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and
Contemporary Threat.
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it
is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and
military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other
components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to
agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse
societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of
the other components tend to creep in as well.
Here's how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any
given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving
minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and
disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street
gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their
percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction
of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food,
thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will
increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves
-- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring
in:
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines - - 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland - - Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule
themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate
goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness
as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing
car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and
threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films
about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:
Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia
formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish
synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and
ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all
other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing
(genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on
infidels, such as in:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77..5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic
cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive
out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been
experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace.
Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses
are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan - - Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical
Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less
radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against
my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins
and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all
of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100%
Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in
ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and
within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not
even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools,
nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not
integrate into the community at large. The children attend Madrasses. They
learn only the Koran.
To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable withdeath. Therefore, in
some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more
power than the national average would indicate.
Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population.
But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists,
Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's
population by the end of this century.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The
Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the
henhouse. The wolves will be herding the sheep! We will wind up sleeping
with the daisies or kneeling down on prayer rugs.
Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts.
Doesn't this make you feel safer already?
Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim,
as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.
DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora,
a devout Muslim who was born in Damascus, Syria, as ADC National Executive
Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).
NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government
official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a
devout Protestant.. .? Just wondering.
Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security
positions?
Doesn't this make you feel safer already??
Was it not "Devout Muslim men" who flew planes into U.S. buildings
8 years ago?
Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood?
And perhaps the most chilling, this statement from Obama's
book, Audacity of Hope, sends a chill up my spine:
"I will stand with them (the Muslims) should the political winds shift in an
ugly direction." (pg. 261) The question is: Who is "them"? He was speaking
of Arab and Pakistani Americans, but does he mean he will stand with the Ft.
Hood Muslim terrorist? Does he mean when they are demanding sharia law that he
will allow it be the law in American cities,
or in their ghettos?? I have no answer. . .
When will the pc crowd wake up?? Get this guy out of the White
House! Source and more
information: xc7x
To share your
thoughts and join an ongoing discussion about this click here
theadultroundtableREALLY-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Breadman,
cameras, cancer
books, cures and help.
Cancer store
candy,
Canon,
Christian music,
cinnamon chocolate,
fiber bars, B4 (See above)
Variable:
I know this is hard for you, but you seem to be making progress.
You are right when you realize that Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Che and Lenin are
all about big government.
You seem to know understand that conservatives (or right wingers, or
neocons, or repukes, or teabaggers or whatever slur you choose to use) oppose
big government.
Now you understand that Hitler was NOT a right winger.
So, if Hitler was NOT a right winger, what was he.
See if you can answer this without any help.
Variable:
I know this is hard for you, but you seem to be making progress.
You are right when you realize that Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Che and Lenin are
all about big government.
You seem to know understand that conservatives (or right wingers, or
neocons, or repukes, or teabaggers or whatever slur you choose to use) oppose
big government.
Now you understand that Hitler was NOT a right winger.
Pay attention.
I know this is hard for you.
This post is about Obama being like Hitler. This post is about both of these
men being progressive socialists.
This post is NOT about Bush. Remember, if you can, Bush is no longer
president. Obama is now President. Obama and most of the Democratic Party
politicians are progressive socialists, like Stalin, Mao, Che and Hitler.
Here is something you must consider - if you want to learn.
Conservatives (or you can slur them as tea baggers or repukes or neocons or
whatever name pops into your head) oppose big government. Conservatives
know that big government is the problem - not the solution.
Those on the left support big government. It is the progresive
socialists today (like Obama and the Democratic Party - and some
Republicans, too) who want bigger government. It has always been the
socialists who want big government - and that includes Hitler, Stalin, Mao
and other totalitarian dictators.
Beck's mind was not polluted by
University leftist professors
Mr. Beck did not graduate from any University. In this way, he
resembles many successful people, like Bill Gates.
Of course the progressive socialist elites think you must
have a "liberal" enforced education to be intelligent - which proves the
socialists elites are snobs and stupid.
Avoiding a university degree may explain why Beck was not
brain washed by leftist socialist progressive professors.
Dear President Obama::
I think Glenn Beck deserves the President's Citizen's Medal of Honor.
Glenn Beck has informed and educated USA citizens. He has inspired
millions to rally against big government spending. He has exposed Communists
and Socialists and Tax Cheats in the White House and Congress. He has
encouraged USA voters to vote against big government statists.
Most recently he has shown the evil roots of the progressive socialism
that is destroying the USA. His documentary, shown on Friday, January 22,
2009, taught about the socialist progressives of recent history who killed 100
million with their Marxist policies.
He taught more history about these totalitarian socialists in one hour than
is taught in entire college careers.
Glenn Beck deserves the President's Civilian Medal of Honor.
It seems to be axiomatic that liberal progressive democrats like to define
problems as being non existent.
If you bring up problems of black crime, the progressive democrats do not
reply to the facts. Instead you are ridiculed and attacked as being a racist.
If you bring up problems of illegal aliens, the progressive democrats do
not reply to the facts. Instead, they call the illegal aliens "immigrants" and
ridicule and attack you as being a racist.
If you bring up the problems of Islamic terrorism, the
progressive democrats do not reply to the facts. Instead, they pretend Islamic
terrorists do not exist and attack you as being a racist.
If you bring up problems in the Obamacare debacle, the progressive
democrats do not reply to the facts. Instead, they ridicule and attack you for
mentioning that eliminating medical cost "waste" requires a government panel to
determine what health care is cost effective for what types of people. They
ridicule and attack you as being without compassion.
All of this is understandable when you understand what drives progressive
socialist democrats - that is the lust for a Statist government in which the
liberals will determine how all live.
This PROVES that repeating such messages has value. It also proves the
democrats are mentally sick hypocrites.
Liberal socialists already know that repeating things gets people to
believe things. The disgusting liberal democrats even repeated obvious lies
over and over, like BUSH LIED, CHILDREN DIED.
These mentally ill liberal democrats do not realize they only show their
incredible hypocrisy when they object to seeing something they think they saw
before.
Where were the hypocritical democrats when the repeated lie "BUSH LIED
CHILDREN DIED" was made.
Ignore
the facts attack Bush
Poor stupid liberal progressive democrats cannot discuss facts. So these
pathetic retards need to do something. Often these nitwits for Obama ignore the
real problems of today by attacking George Bush. The idiocy of democratic party
nitwits seems to have no limit.
Many American Muslims and Arabs prefer to first think of themselves as
Muslims or Arabs, as in Arab-Americans.
Most decent Americans realize we are a nation of diversity of cultures,
religions, genetics and nationalities.
We should respect these diversities.
Before castigating Arabs and Muslims for causing most of the worldwide
terror and killing of innocents, we should investigate Arab and Islamic culture,
genetics, nationalities and religions.
Is there something in the Arab's and Muslim's background that explains
their disproportionate terrorist attacks on innocent people?
Many American negroes prefer to first think of
themselves as Africans, as in African-Americans.
Most decent Americans realize we are a nation of
diversity of cultures, religions, genetics and
nationalities.
We should respect these diversities.
Before castigating blacks for causing
proportionately more crime than other races, we
should investigate African culture, genetics,
nationalities and religions.
Is there something in the African background
that explains the disproportionate criminal behavior
of blacks?
INDONESIA
North Sumatra, two Protestant churches burnt: "too many faithful
and too many prayers by Mathias Hariyadi
At least 1,000 pigs of Islam set fire to the Pentecostal community
places of worship. According to local Muslim killers for Allah, the two
buildings did not have the legal permits as "churches." The Nahdlatul Ulama
actually bragged about the violence of cowardly radical Islamists against
Christians.
In 2009 in Indonesia, there were 35 cases of violation of religious
freedom, 28 of them were against Christians.
There seems to be a reawakening of decency and respect for life in the USA.
While the progressive socialist Democrats will not like to know this, Youngest
Americans today are More Pro-Life on Abortion Than Baby
Boomers
Washington, DC -- As hundreds of thousands of pro-life Americans
young and old participate in the March for Life in Washington
today, a new poll finds most marchers will likely be from the
millennial generation or Generation X. The most recent Marist
survey finds them the most pro-life on abortion.
There were at least 97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And
Could not Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime. Now that we have a President
who was born a Muslim, Democrats are less trustworthy than ever.
Attempted Islamic terrorists attacks on the USA have increased
since the Muslim-born Obama took office. There were more new attempted
attacks on the USA in Obama's first year in office than all of Bush's years.
Obama refuses to even admit that Islamic terrorists exist.
Obama has made a public announcement of surrender to Islamic
terrorists in Afghanistan by August 2011.
Today's Democrats are nothing like Presidents Roosevelt, Truman and
Kennedy, who with courage and decisive action kept on top of their jobs and
aggressively confronted one national defense crisis after another.
Jimmy Carter, elected during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and (1)
believing Americans had an inordinate fear of communism, (2) lifted U.S.
citizens' travel bans to Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia and (3)
pardoned draft evaders.
President Carter (4) also stopped B-1 bomber production, (5) gave away our
strategically located Panama Canal and (6) made human rights the central focus
of his foreign policy.
That led Carter, a Democrat, (7) to make a monumental miscalculation and
withdraw U.S. support for our long-standing Mideast military ally, the Shah of
Iran. (8) Carter simply didn't like the Shah's alleged mistreatment of
imprisoned Soviet spies.
The Soviets, (9) with close military ties to Iraq, a 1,500-mile border with Iran
and eyes on Afghanistan, aggressively tried to encircle, infiltrate, subvert and
overthrow Iran's government for its oil deposits and warm-water ports several
times after Russian troops attempted to stay there at the end of WWII. These
were all communist threats to Iran that Carter never understood.
Carter (10) thought Ayatollah Khomeini, a Muslim exile in Paris, would make a
fairer Iranian leader than the Shah because he was a religious man. (11) With
U.S. support withdrawn, the Shah was overthrown, and (12) the ayatollah returned
and promptly proclaimed Iran an Islamic nation. (13) Executions followed.
Palestinian hit men were hired to secretly eliminate the opposition so the
religious mullahs couldn't be blamed.
Iran's ayatollah (14) then introduces the idea of suicide bombers to the
Palestine Liberation Organization and paid $35,000 to PLO families whose young
people were brainwashed to attack and kill as many Israeli citizens as possible
by blowing themselves up. This inhumane menace has grown unchallenged.
The ayatollah (15) next created and financed with Iran's oil wealth Hezbollah, a
terrorist organization that later bombed our barracks in Beirut, killing 241
Marines and sailors. With Iran's encouragement this summer, (16) Hezbollah
attacked Israel and started a war that damaged Lebanon and (17) diverted the
world's attention from Iran's nuclear bomb program.
In November 1979, Iranians, including (18) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, their current
puppet president who was elected in an unfree, rigged election in which
opponents were intimidated into not running, (19) stormed the U.S. Embassy in
Tehran and held 52 U.S. personnel hostage for 444 days.
Carter, after nearly six months, (20) belatedly attempted a poorly executed
rescue with only six Navy helicopters (three were lost or disabled in
sandstorms) and Air Force planes with Delta Force commandos. The mission was
aborted, but foul-ups on the ground resulted in a loss of eight aircraft, five
airman and three Marines. The bungled plan was never put down on paper for the
Joint Chiefs to evaluate. There were practice sessions, but no full dress
rehearsal, and pilots weren't allowed to meet with their weather forecasters
because someone in authority worried about security.
America (21) can thank the well-meaning but naive and inexperienced Democrat,
Jimmy Carter, for a foreign policy that lost a strong military ally, Iran, and
(22) put the U.S. at odds with a gangster regime that was determined to build
nuclear bombs to wipe Israel off the map and threaten the U.S. and other
nations. Iran also has a working relationship with al-Qaida, which also wants
nukes. Care to connect the dots?
Shortly after a meeting at which Carter kissed Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev on
each cheek, (23) the USSR invaded Afghanistan. Carter the appeaser was shocked.
"I can't believe the Russians lied to me," he said.
During the Carter Democrat period, (24) communism was on a rampage worldwide. In
an unrestrained country-capturing spree, communists took over (25) Ethiopia,
(26) South Yemen ( (27) located at the mouth of the Red Sea where they could
block Mideast oil shipments and access to the Suez Canal), (28) Afghanistan,
(29) Angola, (30) Cambodia, (31) Mozambique, (32) Grenada and ( 33) Nicaragua.
Compared to the pre-Vietnam War defense budget in 1964, Carter requested in
fiscal 1982's defense budget (34) a 45% reduction in fighter aircraft, (35) a
75% reduction in ships, (36) an 83% reduction in attack submarines and (37) a
90% reduction in helicopters.
The Soviets for years (38) consistently spent 15% of their GDP on defense; (39)
in 1980 we spent under 5%. As a percentage of our government's spending, defense
was lower than before Pearl Harbor. No wonder a Republican, Ronald Reagan, had
to vastly increase defense spending to help us win the 45-year-old Cold War and
relegate the USSR to the ash heap of history — an astounding feat no one (except
Reagan) believed possible.
In addition to a communist enemy rapidly expanding its territorial conquests,
Reagan (40) inherited from Democratic management a 12% inflation rate (highest
in 34 years), (41) 21% interest rates (highest since Abraham Lincoln was
president), (42) a depleted military and (43) a serious energy crisis.
For eight years (44) congressional Democrats ridiculed and fought with Reagan
and were on the wrong side of nearly all his defense and economic policies. They
said he wasn't bright — an "amiable dunce," as party elder Clark Clifford (45)
put it. They maintained his tax cuts wouldn't work, (46) that he insulted the
Soviets by labeling them the "Evil Empire" (47) and that he was going to start
World War III by putting missiles in West Germany to counter new Soviet SS-20
nuclear missiles installed in East Germany. (48) John Kerry wanted a nuclear
freeze that would guarantee the Soviets overwhelming tactical nuclear
superiority in Europe. (49) Kerry seemed to constantly advise retreating, giving
up and handing our enemies what they wanted — a recipe for us to lose every war.
Democrats waffled (50) on Reagan's request for support of Contras who were
fighting to stay alive and take Nicaragua back from Daniel Ortega's communist
Sandinistas. Each month, the Soviets poured $50 million worth of Russian tanks,
anti-aircraft weapons, Hind attack helicopters and munitions into that central
American country.
Democratic leaders (51) all dismissed as a ridiculous pipe dream Reagan's plan
for the U.S. to develop a missile that could shoot down incoming enemy missiles.
(52) Showing no vision, Democrats mockingly called it Star Wars.
Democratic politicians (53) were proved wrong on virtually every vital Reagan
policy. (54) His tax cuts set off a huge seven-year economic boom that created
20 million new jobs. (55) Interest rates tumbled from 21% to 7 1/2%. (56)
Inflation nose-dived from 12% to 3%. And (57) oil prices collapsed when —
contrary to warnings from Democrats — he removed price controls on natural gas.
Reagan's motto was "Peace through Strength," (58) not peace through weakness and
accommodation. With his steadfast determination and perseverance, the communists
were kicked out of Grenada and defeated in Nicaragua, Ethiopia and Afghanistan.
And for the first time in history Soviet expansion ended.
Reagan (59) never quit exerting pressure on the Soviets. In Berlin, he demanded
that Gorbachev "tear down this wall," and in time the Berlin Wall fell. In the
end the communist Soviet Union dissolved. The Reagan-Bush administration had won
the Cold War.
Years later, (60) a group of Russian generals were asked about the one key that
led to the collapse of the USSR. They were unanimous in their response: "Star
Wars." Gorbachev feared it would render the Soviets' nuclear missiles obsolete
for an overwhelming first strike, and they could not afford to build the
hundreds more that would be needed or hope to match America's great technical
ability. (61) So Gorbachev threw in the towel after Reagan held firm at
Reykjavik and refused to stop SDI research. Years later (62) Gorbachev said he
didn't think it could have ever happened if Reagan hadn't been there.
In July 2001, (63) the U.S. military used an SDI missile launched thousands of
miles away and flying at near bullet speed to blow a test missile out of the
sky. (64) Democrats from Dukakis to Gore to Kerry all said this would be
impossible and that missile defense would never work. They were all wrong.
Reagan was right.
The current terrorist threat (65) to U.S. national security did not begin on
9/11, but in the early 1990s. Bill Clinton was elected November 1992. (66) The
first bombing of our World Trade Center on Feb. 26, 1993, killed six people and
injured 1,000. Terrorists hoped to kill 250,000. (67) Some of the apprehended
terrorists were trained in bomb making at the Khalden terrorist camp in
Afghanistan.
October 1993. (68) A Somali warlord, with help from weapons and top trainers
sent by al-Qaida, shot down two U.S. Blackhawk helicopters. Eighteen Americans
were killed and 73 wounded. Clinton, under pressure from a Democratic Congress,
ordered retreat and withdrawal of all U.S. forces. Said Osama bin Laden: "They
planned for a long struggle, but the U.S. rushed out in shame."
January 1995. (69) Philippine police discovered Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the
World Trade Center bombing, had a plan to blow up 12 American airliners over the
ocean and fly a plane into CIA headquarters. They informed Clinton's government
of the plot.
Bin Laden (70) tried to buy weapons-grade uranium to develop a weapon that would
kill on a mass basis — like Hiroshima. (71) In November 1995, a car bomb
exploded at a Saudi-U.S. joint facility in Riyadh, killing five Americans.
June 1996. (72) Khobar Towers, which housed U.S. Air Force personnel in Saudi
Arabia, was blown up by Saudi Hezbollahs with help from Iran and some al-Qaida
involvement. Nineteen Americans were killed and 372 wounded.
July-August 1996. (73) The U.S. received from senior level al-Qaida defectors
intelligence on the creation, character, direction and intentions of al-Qaida.
February 1998. (74) Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri issued a fatwa declaring "war
on America" and making the murder of any American anywhere on earth the
"individual duty" of every Muslim.
May 29, 1998. Finally, (75) after a long series of deadly bombings carried out
since 1992, and bin Laden calls to attack the U.S., Clinton's CIA created a plan
to raid and capture the al-Qaida leader at his Tarnak Farms compound in
Afghanistan. After months of planning, consultations with senior officials in
other departments and numerous full rehearsals that went well, the raid was
called off at the last moment by CIA Director George Tenet and others worried
about possible collateral damage and second-guessing and recrimination if bin
Laden didn't survive.
Aug. 7, 1998. (76) Al-Qaida blew up U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam,
five minutes apart, killing 200, injuring 5,000.
Now (77) Clinton's team, wanting to take stronger action, decided to fire
Tomahawk missiles at bin Laden's training camps as well as a Sudan aspirin
factory. (78) But the administration gave up to 48 hours notice to certain
people, including the chief of staff of Pakistan's army, so India wouldn't think
the missiles were aimed at them. Somehow forewarned, bin Laden and his terrorist
leaders all left — no terrorists were killed, but U.S. ineffectiveness was on
full display.
Dec. 20, 1998. (79) Intelligence knew bin Laden would be at the Haii house in
Kandahar but again passed up the opportunity due to potential collateral damage
and the risk of failure. (80) Clinton approved a plan by his national security
adviser, Sandy Berger, to use tribals to capture bin Laden. But nothing
happened.
Next, (81) the Pentagon created a plan to use an HC 130 gunship, a more precise
method, against bin Laden's headquarters, but the plan was later shelved. Lt.
Gen. William Boykin, deputy undersecretary of defense, told the 9/11 Commission
"opportunities were missed due to an unwillingness to take risks and a lack of
vision and understanding. "
Feb. 10, 1999. (82) The CIA knew bin Laden would be at a desert hunting camp the
next morning, the 11th. But the military failed to act because an official
airplane of the United Arab Emirates was there and it was feared an Emirate
prince or official might be killed.
May 1999. (83) Detailed reports from several sources let the CIA know that bin
Laden would be in Kandahar for five days. Everyone agreed it was the best chance
to get bin Laden. But word came to stand down. It was believed Tenet and Clinton
were again concerned about civilian collateral damage. A key project chief
angrily said three opportunities were missed in 36 hours. October 2000, (84) the
USS Cole was bombed, killing 17 U.S. sailors. No action was taken due to
concerns expressed by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.
Americans must learn from history and costly mistakes. Sadly, (85) Democrat
Jimmy Carter, a Southern peanut farmer, became our Neville Chamberlain, creating
the specific conditions that have brought us the three greatest threats to our
national security today: 1) (86) Iran's nuke-bound terrorists; 2) (87) al-Qaida
and other terrorists; and 3) (88) North Korea and its nuclear weapons.
Carter's (89) inability to deal with the Soviet communists emboldened them to
invade Afghanistan. A 23-year-old bin Laden also was drawn there to recruit
young Muslim fighters and build a network to raise money for the anti-Soviet
jihad that later became al-Qaida.
Years later, (90) civilian Carter took it on himself to go to North Korea and
negotiate a peace agreement that would stop that communist country from
developing nuclear weapons. He then convinced Clinton and Albright to go along
with it. (91) The signed piece of paper proved worthless, as the Koreans easily
deceived Democrats and used our money, incentives and technical equipment to
build nuclear bombs and increase the threat we face today.
The Clinton administration (92) had at least 10 chances to get bin Laden, but it
repeatedly could not make the decision to act. There were too many people and
departments involved, too much confusion and no strong leader to make the tough
decisions to act. They were too timid and concerned about repercussions if they
failed.
Contrast this inability to take action with Harry Truman's ability to make sound
decisions and get results on complex defense issues — from dropping the bomb to
end WWII to helping Iran and Turkey stave off the Soviets, from defending Greece
from communist takeover following WWII to confronting and beating the Soviet's
Berlin blockade with a 14-month night-and-day Berlin airlift, from taking on the
North Koreans to ultimately firing the popular Gen. Douglas MacArthur for
insubordination.
Further Democratic incompetence in matters of defense emerged from Clinton's
attorney general, Janet Reno, and her deputy, Jamie Gorelick. (93) They built a
legal barrier that in effect prevented the CIA from sharing intelligence with
the FBI before 9/11.
Democrats in the Clinton administration (94) allowed the selling of important
defense technology and secrets to the Chinese, who are now engaged in a massive
military buildup.
Estimates are that (95) 10,000 to 20,000 terrorists were trained in bin Laden's
many camps in the years before 9/11.
Oil is also vital for our national defense. In 1952 we produced 93% of the oil
we consumed. Now we depend on the Mideast and others for 66%. Democrats have
been largely responsible for this because they have blocked all efforts to drill
in Alaska and certain offshore areas estimated to contain 10 billion to 20
billion barrels of crude.
Democrats (96) in Congress condemn current efforts to intercept terrorist phone
calls, to mine data to ferret out future attacks against us, and to trace the
movement of terrorist money through banks. All the while they want special
treatment for enemy prisoners captured on the battlefield. This helps the enemy
and undermines our troops in the field.
We're in a war. Something always goes wrong in a war, and our military leaders
have made mistakes in Iraq. But quitting and leaving would amount to defeat for
the U.S. in the global war on terrorism and create chaos. Quitters never win.
Here's the problem: America needs two strong, sound political parties. As far as
domestic policy is concerned, it really doesn't make much difference if
Democrats or Republicans are in power. Ours is a free, entrepreneurial society
where anyone can do anything he or she wants if they have a positive attitude
and the desire to work, learn and achieve. Ambitious people come from all over
the world to take advantage of this tremendous opportunity. This is one reason
our economy is so resilient, continually bouncing back from periodic setbacks,
driven by new inventions and achievements.
However, (97) when it comes to which party has proved more capable in acting to
defend and protect Americans from foreign enemies, there is only one choice.
From Johnson to Carter to Clinton, virtually all the defense policies and
decisions made by Democratic administrations have been unsuccessful. And in many
cases, they have unintentionally but materially increased the danger to our
national security and the safety of all Americans.
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 9/29/2006 updated 2010
Muslim Maniacs Destroy all
they see for their blood lusting Allah
In 2001, the monumental sixth century Buddhas of Bamiyan were dynamited on
orders from Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. The United States and other
Western governments issued protests. Afghanistan’s Islamist rulers shrugged them
off. The Obama Administration now likes the idea of negotiating with the
Taliban barbarians.
In 2010, Al-Kifl, the tomb of the Prophet Ezekiel, near Baghdad, is being
desecrated. On the tomb are inscriptions in Hebrew and an ark in which a Torah
was displayed centuries ago. Iraq’s Antiquities and Heritage Authority, under
pressure from Islamists, is erasing the Hebrew words, removing the Hebrew
ornaments and planning to build a mosque on top of the grave. The Obama
Administration and Obama call these Muslim barbarioans "civilized."
So far, we’re hearing protests from almost no one. But this is not just
another “Where is the outrage?” story. The larger and more alarming trend is
that in a growing number of Muslim-majority countries a war is being waged
against non-Muslim minorities. The Obama Administration refuses to even
recogninize this war by Islamic terrorists exists.
Where non-Muslim minorities already have been “cleansed” — as in
Afghanistan and Iraq — the attacks are against their memory. Ethnic minorities
also are being targeted: The genocidal conflict against the black Muslims of
Darfur is only the most infamous example. The Obama Administration utters not a
single word abiut the genocides.
Connect these dots: In Nigeria this week, Muslim youths set fire to a
church, killing more than two dozen Christian worshippers. In Egypt, Coptic
Christians have been suffering increased persecution including, this month, a
drive-by shooting outside a church in which seven people were murdered. On
these message boards progressive democrats claim all this violence is because
the USA has not destroyed Israel.
In Pakistan, Christian churches were bombed over Christmas. In Turkey,
authorities have been closing Christian churches, monasteries and schools.
Recently, churches in Malaysia have been attacked, too, provoked by this
grievance: Christians inside the churches were referring to God as “Allah.” How
dare infidels use the same name for the Almighty as do Muslims!
Many Muslims, no doubt, disapprove of the persecution of non-Muslims. But
in most Muslim-majority countries, any Muslim openly opposing the Islamists
risks being branded an apostate. And under the Islamist interpretation of Sharia,
Islamic law, apostates deserve death. In the USA you will not see any stron
protests against the babaric Muslim actions by Muslim organizations or Muslims.
Not so long ago, the broader Middle East was a diverse region. Lebanon had
a Christian majority for centuries but that ended around 1990 — the result of
years of civil war among the country’s religious and ethnic communities.
The Christian population of Turkey has diminished substantially in recent
years. Islamists have driven Christians out of Bethlehem and other parts of the
West Bank; almost all Christians have fled Gaza since Hamas’ takeover.
There were Jewish communities throughout the Middle East for millennia.
The Jews of Iran trace their history back 2,700 years but about eight out of 10
Iranian Jews have emigrated since the 1979 Islamist Revolution; only about
40,000 remain.
The Jews of what is now Saudi Arabia were wiped out shortly after Mohammad
and his followers established a new religion and began to build a new empire in
the 7th century A.D. But Jewish communities survived elsewhere until after World
War II when Jews were forced to abandon their homes in Iraq, Libya, Egypt,
Syria, Yemen and other countries.
In many cases, they were driven out by Muslims furious over the establishment
of the modern state of Israel. But how odd is it to protest the creation of a
safe haven and homeland for Jews by making your own Jewish citizens homeless and
stateless?
In 1947, Pakistan also was founded as a safe haven — for Indian Muslims.
The country’s founding father, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, was determined that Pakistan
would be tolerant of Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees and others — as much as
20 percent of the population at independence. It hasn’t worked out that way and,
as a result, non-Muslim minorities today constitute only about 3 percent of
Pakistan’s population.
When the dots are connected, the picture that emerges is not pretty: An
“Islamic world” in which terrorists are regarded often with lenience, sometimes
with respect and occasionally with reverence, while minority groups face
increasing intolerance, persecution and “cleansing,” where even their histories
are erased.
And, we in the West are too polite, too “politically correct,” and perhaps
too cowardly to say much about it. It is clear the Muslim-born Obama will
continue to support the Islamic barbarians as they kill and destroy on the name
of their blood lusting Allah.
Looks like Arab Muslims may buy up USA News outlets -
to make sure they can keep on hiding Islamic barbarianism.
Do you think our socialist president may have called his Muslim Brothers and
asked them to do more for Haiti?
For those progressive socialists who may be as dumb as their posts suggest,
8/28/2010 Is the 28th day of August, this year.
Israel is not alone among nations in the Middle East area helping the people
of Haiti.
AL QAEDA AND OTHER ISLAMIC TERRORIST GROUPS HAVE SENT SQUADS OF
TERRORISTS-IN-TRAINING TO HAITI.
These terrorists-in-training are strapping bombs on old people and babies. They
are also practicing the Islamic tradition of beheading - only on those too sick
or hurt to fight back.
BECK - 08-28-2010 - BECK BECK - 08-28-2010 - BECK
Over 4 million people watched Beck's documentary showing that Nazis and
fascists are statists - just like Obama and the crrent progressive socialist
democrats.
Mark down August 28, 2010 on your calendar. That's the day we join Beck
in Washington DC.
Assume you have a politician who says the following things.
Would you vote for this politician? "I now know big government is the problem not the solution.
We need smaller government and less taxes.
We must encourage the free market - not discourage it.
The only major job of the federal government is to protect this country. We
need a strong military.
We need a strong border.
We need to use e-verify to make sure no one illegally in this country has
a job.
We need to stop using taxpayer money to provide services to people who
are not here legally.
We need fewer regulations in many areas.
We need to enable health insurance companies to sell health insurance across
state lines.
We need to reduce the regulations that prevent businesses drilling for oil and
building nuclear power facilities.
We need to reuce the regulations that encourage businesses to create jobs
overseas.
We need to stop using government force to protect profit destroying and job
destroying union practices.
We must stop using government force to make children go to failing public
schools."
No. 24: End income tax for seniors making less than $50,000
"Will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than
$50,000 per year. This will eliminate taxes for 7 million
seniors -- saving them an average of $1,400 a year-- and will
also mean that 27 million seniors will not need to file an
income tax return at all."
No. 86: Direct the Secretary of Health and Human
Services to conduct a comprehensive study of federal cancer
initiatives
"As president, Barack Obama will immediately direct his
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in collaboration with
agency officials, academic researchers, cancer survivors and
advocates for people with cancer, and state public health
officials, to comprehensively examine the various cancer-related
efforts of federal agencies, and provide recommendations to
eliminate barriers to effective coordination across federal
agencies and between the federal government and other
stakeholders."
No. 234: Allow five days of public comment before
signing bills
To reduce bills rushed through Congress and to the president
before the public has the opportunity to review them, Obama
"will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the
American public an opportunity to review and comment on the
White House website for five days."
No. 240: Tougher rules against revolving door for
lobbyists and former officials
"No political appointees in an Obama-Biden administration will
be permitted to work on regulations or contracts directly and
substantially related to their prior employer for two years. And
no political appointee will be able to lobby the executive
branch after leaving government service during the remainder of
the administration."
"Will double funding for the main federal support for
afterschool programs, the 21st Century Learning Centers program,
to serve one million more children."
No. 313: Allow bankruptcy judges to modify terms
of a home mortgage
Will repeal provisions of the Chapter 13 law that prohibit
bankruptcy judges from modifying the original terms of home
mortgages for ordinary families -- regardless of whether the
loan was predatory or unfair or is otherwise unaffordable -- "so
that ordinary families can also get relief that bankruptcy laws
were intended to provide."
No. 379: Pay for the national service plan
without increasing the deficit
"Will maintain fiscal responsibility and prevent any increase in
the deficit by offsetting cuts and revenue sources in other
parts of the government (to pay for a national service plan that
will cost about $3.5 billion per year when it is fully
implemented). This plan will be paid for in part by cancelling
tax provisions that would otherwise help multinational
corporations pay less in U.S. taxes starting in 2008 by
reallocating tax deductions for interest expenses between income
earned in the U.S. and income earned abroad. The rest of the
plan will be funded using a small portion of the savings
associated with ending the war in Iraq."
No. 508: Allow penalty-free hardship withdrawals
from retirement accounts in 2008 and 2009
"Obama and Biden are calling for legislation that would allow
withdrawals of 15% up to $10,000 from retirement accounts
without penalty (although subject to the normal taxes). This
would apply to withdrawals in 2008 (including retroactively) and
2009."
"Two years ago, I criticized the Secretary of State for the
firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he
properly used the term 'genocide' to describe Turkey's slaughter
of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915. … as President I
will recognize the Armenian Genocide."
No. 517: Negotiate health care reform in public
sessions televised on C-SPAN
To achieve health care reform, "I'm going to have all the
negotiations around a big table. We'll have doctors and nurses
and hospital administrators. Insurance companies, drug companies
-- they'll get a seat at the table, they just won't be able to
buy every chair. But what we will do is, we'll have the
negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is
making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are
making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the
insurance companies. And so, that approach, I think is what is
going to allow people to stay involved in this process."
dailymail.co.uk:
A job centre has been slammed for refusing to display an advert for
a 'reliable workers' - because it discriminated
against unreliable applicants.
Recruitment boss Nicole Mamo, 48, tried to post an advert for a
#5.80-an-hour domestic cleaner on her local
Jobcentre Plus website.
She ended the job offer by saying that any applicants for the post
'must be very reliable and hard-working'.
But when Ms Mamo called the Jobcentre Plus in Thetford, Norfolk,
the following day she was told that her advert would
not be displayed
A Jobcentre Plus worker claimed that the word 'reliable' meant they
could be sued for discriminating against unreliable
workers.
The mother-of-two from
Hertfordshire today slammed the situation as
'ridiculous'.
She said: 'I placed the advert on
the website and when I phoned up to check I was told
it hadn't been displayed in the job centre itself
'She said "oh we can't put that advert on the job
points".
'She said it was because they could have cases
against them for discriminating against unreliable
people.
'I laughed because I thought that was crazy. We
supply the NHS with staff so it's very important for
the patients that we have reliable workers.
'We find jobs for hundreds of temporary staff
every week and are proud of our workers but our
reputation is at stake if they aren't reliable.
'We are taking people off the dole and finding
them jobs so not displaying the advert just seems
absolutely ridiculous to me.'
Nicole, who runs Devonwood recruitment agency and
employs eight people, placed her advert on the
Thetford Jobcentre Plus website on January 21 this
year.
The job offer, which cost nothing to display,
read: 'Domestic cleaner required immediately. A
variety of different shifts available. Must be
fluent in written and spoken English for health and
safety reasons. Previous experience preferred.
Training will be provided. Must be very reliable and
hard-working.'
The following day Nicole phoned Thetford
Jobcentre Plus and was told by a woman that her
advert could not be displayed.
She claimed that the job centre could be sued by
unreliable people if they placed the advert on their
'job points' but told Nicole it will remain on their
website.
A spokeswoman for the Campaign Against Political
Correctness described the decision not to display
Nicole's advert as 'ridiculous'.
She said: 'This situation is
absolutely ridiculous - of course people want
reliable workers and of course employers should be
able to ask for them.
'If they can't advertise for what they actually
want then the system is broken. They won't be able
to find workers who meet their criteria.
'In order to have decided that the word
"reliable" can't be used they must have put a great
deal of thought and time into it.
'That time could be better spent getting the
right people to apply for the right jobs - which is
what this advert was trying to do in the first place
The awakening of both the career democratic politicians -
and the extremist socialist progressive democrats
is splitting the Democratic Party.
The career democratic politicians were happy to go along
with the extremist socialist progressive democrats
when it helped them get elected in 2008. Now, things have changed.
Now, career democratic politicians will help the Republican
politicians avoid the destruction of the traditional USA.
Destroying the USA, especially the free market system and individualism, are
the stated goals of Obama and the extremist
socialist progressive democrats
So, how many babies vs. non-babies did you see above? Was it 5 vs.
9, 8 vs. 6, 11 vs. 3 ... or were they all babies?
