|
| |
Dick's Guide to Election 2008
Also, see other
Dick's Guides to
College
Happiness
Health
Knowledge
Love
Pleasure
Wealth AND
Dick's Cyberspace Mall with
over 1000 stores
Dick's Guide to Election 2008:
Index of terms
News for
Election 2008: Presidential candidates,
Hillary
Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden,
Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama,
Duncan Hunter, John McCain, Mitt Romney,
Tom Tancredo, Fred Thompson,
Bill Richardson Third Parties:
The
Libertarian Party is the most successful third party in the USA
Other pages to see:
Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Christopher Dodd
John Edwards
Barack Obama
Rudy Giuliani
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Fred Thompson
Latest News November 6, 2007
Polls
agree Richardson is the one Democratic candidate that Democrats, independents
and Republicans would most likely vote for.
Former president
of the anti-life, pro choice feminist group NARAL,
Kate
Michelman, attacks Hillary, saying the sole woman Democrat hopeful raises 'white
flag' when pressed on issues and answers.
Help the most successful third party in the nation, The
Libertarian Party. The party has won
a full
third of the races that we've entered.
Polls prove Democrat voters want Hillary and
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Democrats are now too smart to think
illegal immigration matters.
Latest News November 3, 2008
Mitt Romney
Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney
as president
John Edwards
Help John
Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
Hillary Clinton
Hillary will not return much of Hsu's illegal campaign donations.
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Special Interest
Groups: Special Interest
groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to
Presidential candidates.
Bill Richardson New Mexico's State
workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's
presidential campaign.
Campaign Finances:
Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Democratic Party:
Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in November 2007
to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president.
Barack Obama,
Bill
Richardson New Mexico's State
workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's
presidential campaign.
Polls
agree Richardson is the one Democratic candidate that Democrats, independents
and Republicans would most likely vote for.
Christopher Dodd,
Duncan Hunter,
will be on FOX news November 8, 2007 on
Your World with Neil Cavuto at
7:00PM EST, 4:00PM Pacific.
Tomorrow, Rep. November 9, 2007 Hunter will
be on CNN's Glen Beck's evening show. Please check local listings for exact
time in your area.
Duncan Hunter looking for help in Iowa Caucus
Fred Thompson
Hillary Clinton
Hillary will not return much of Hsu's illegal campaign donations.
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Polls prove Democrat voters want Hillary and
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Democrats are now too smart to think
illegal immigration matters.
Joe Biden,
John Edwards
Help John
Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president
Rudy Giuliani
Tom Tancredo,
Other issues:
Campaign Finances:
Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Democratic Party
Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in November 2007
to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president.
Libertarian Party:
Libertarian
Party
Special Interest Groups:

Duncan
Hunter looking for help in Iowa Caucus
Dear DicksGuides,
Over the past year I have been humbled by the support of people like you
who believe in true conservative values and republican principles. We
have just eight weeks till the Iowa Caucuses and we have begun our voter
outreach and mobilization in every Iowa and New Hampshire County.
Even a
$25 contribution will help begin running our direct mail and media
campaigns in New Hampshire and Iowa. We can’t do this without your help!!!
https://contribute.gohunter08.com
While the media focuses the spotlight on endorsements and personal
matters, they continue to ignore the issues that this campaign is about.
This campaign is about:
• Protecting high-paying American jobs
• Enforcing our trade agreements
• Providing our military with necessary support to fight terrorism
• Enforcing our immigration laws
• Securing our rights to bear arms
• Limiting government spending.
https://contribute.gohunter08.com
With your help today we can make a difference come January 3rd and send a
message that true conservative principles and republican values do not
change during an election year. Please take a moment to remember that
conservative principles are worth fighting for.
https://contribute.gohunter08.com
Thanks,
Duncan Hunter
Former
president of the feminist NARAL,
Kate Michelman, attacks Hillary,
saying the sole woman Democrat hopeful raises 'white flag' when
pressed on issues and answers.
By Richard B. Schmitt, Los Angeles
Times Staff Writer
November 4, 2007
WASHINGTON -- A prominent feminist,
allied with the presidential campaign of former Sen. John
Edwards, accused Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham
Clinton on Saturday of "disingenuously playing the victim card"
by infusing her campaign with messages about gender.
"When unchallenged, in a comfortable, controlled situation, Sen.
Clinton embraces her political elevation into the 'boys club,' "
Kate Michelman, the former president of NARAL Pro-Choice
America, wrote in a posting on a blog of the liberal group Open
Left. But when she's challenged,
when legitimate questions are asked, questions she should be
prepared to answer and discuss, she is just as quick to raise
the white flag and look for a change in the rules," Michelman
said. "It's trying to have it both ways."
The missive by Michelman, a senior advisor to the Edwards
campaign, was the latest salvo in a week in which gender flared
as an issue in the Democratic presidential contest. Her cutting
comments were publicized by the Edwards campaign in a press
release.
The issue erupted after the Clinton campaign complained that
male Democratic rivals at Tuesday night's presidential debate in
Philadelphia had subjected her to a "pile-on." At
the debate, Clinton appeared to give nonspecific answers on
several topics, such as on whether she supported the
controversial plan of New York's Democratic governor, Eliot
Spitzer, to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.
Democratic rivals seized the moment as an opportunity to portray
Clinton as a calculating candidate with chameleon-like views.
Clinton's campaign subsequently posted a video on her website
called "The Politics of Pile-On" that showed clips of the men at
the debate uttering her name in rapid-fire succession.
On Thursday, she gave a speech at her alma mater, Wellesley
College, in which she spoke about her effort to break into "the
all-boys club of presidential politics."
Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, a top rival to Clinton in the
Democratic race, said of the New York senator Friday that when
"people start challenging her point of view, that suddenly she
backs off and says, 'Don't pick on me.' "
Michelman reacted similarly.
"At one minute the strong woman ready to lead, the next, she's
the woman under attack, disingenuously playing the victim card
as a means of trying to avoid giving honest, direct answers to
legitimate questions," Michelman wrote of Clinton.
"It is not presidential," Michelman said, adding that women
"know better than to use our gender as a shield when the
questions get too hot."
Phil Singer, spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said Saturday
that Edwards, who represented North Carolina, and the other
candidates were fabricating an issue out of desperation.
"The other candidates aren't going after Sen. Clinton because
she's a woman, they're going after her because she's leading in
the polls," Singer said. "Voters will make a decision about
whether John Edwards' pledges to be positive" were anything more
than just a political tactic
Source:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clinton4nov04,0,612985.story?coll=la-politics-campaign
Polls prove Democrat voters want Hillary and
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Democrats are now too smart to think
illegal immigration matters.
Immediately after last Tuesday's Democratic candidates
debate,
I wrote that Hillary Clinton had emerged with a decisive victory:
If there was ever any doubt about which of
the Democratic Presidential candidates is best suited to lead America,
tonight's debate should go a long way toward eliminating it. Hillary
Clinton, poised, prepared and confident, dramatically outshone all
competitors once again, in a debate largely characterized by her opponents'
awkward attempts to shake her from her frontrunner's perch.
Literally as I was writing, however, I listened
in incredulity as MSNBC's Chris
Matthews crowed breathlessly that Mrs. Clinton had so badly fumbled the
final question about New York State Governor Elliot Spitzer's
pending legislation on "drivers' licenses for illegals," as to lose not only
the debate, but presumably, her chances at the Presidential nomination itself.
This is Chris Matthews, from the post-debate
coverage transcript:
I am stunned because it took to the last
minute; it was the last round knockout perhaps. Hillary Clinton would not
answer the question straight. Do you support giving driver‘s licenses in the
state of New York that you represent in the U.S. Senate to the illegal
aliens? She kept saying over and over again undocumented workers. That‘s the
nice way of putting it. Fair enough, but she wouldn‘t answer the question.
She said yes, then, she said no. What did she say?
...The first story coming out of this debate,
the first run at this by the Associated Press pointed to the issue that the
two chief opponents Barack Obama and John Edwards were hitting on, the issue
of character and double talk. I didn‘t hear it that well. I kept hearing
Iraq and Iran. But the way other reporters heard it was they‘re hitting her
on not being reliable, she‘s not genuine, Hillary isn‘t who she‘s saying she
is and then Tim Russert, one of the moderators tonight nailed her with that
question. She said it was a gotcha question. A gotcha question is a weird
question that doesn‘t relate to the central debate of our time. Who‘s the
prime minister of Canada, no, just kidding. But the central question of
immigration is so hot on the Republican side, it may well drive their
nominating fight.
The "Hillary blew it" mantra has filled the cable
news airwaves ever since.
Apparently Democratic voters aren't buying it.
According to a new
Newsweek poll:
....The New York senator gets 44 percent of
the overall Democratic vote, compared to 24 percent for Obama (down a point
since NEWSWEEK's August poll) and 12 percent for Edwards (down two points).
She is the first choice of 45 percent of self-identified Democrats (compared
with 39 percent of Democratic "leaners"). She also trounces Obama among
Democratic female voters (48 to 19 percent) and enjoys a marginal lead among
male Democratic voters (38 to 32 percent). Obama runs better among younger
Democratic voters and minorities.
The political spinning and gamesmanship of the
mainstream press may well be a large part of what is troubled in America today.
In times such as these, the notion that primary
voters would even consider a candidate's views about an issue as marginal as
state drivers' licenses in determining who should be President of the United
States is more than a bit insulting to the collective American intelligence.
Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan must be resolved.
War with Iran must be avoided. Nuclear-armed Pakistan has disintegrated into
martial law with opposition leaders, judges and lawyers rounded up and arrested
overnight.
America's foreign policy - insult, demand,
provoke, shock and awe - is widely rebuked, resisted and feared throughout the
world. The land of freedom and tolerance has been diminished to the point that
current congressional testimony openly dances around the previously unthinkable
question, "how badly are we allowed to hurt someone before it's called torture?"
Domestically, borders remain porous. The American
dollar is sinking, fast. The economy appears headed for serious turbulence due
to unchecked military expenditure, record deficits, credit woes, high energy
costs, job exportation and diminished international confidence. Millions of
Americans have no health care. New Orleans is still a disaster. Civil liberties
are undergoing a subtle and constant squeeze.
These are grave and unavoidable issues. Each must
be seriously addressed in a 2008 election that will redefine America in the
post-Bush era.
It is becoming thankfully clear that so long as
the media's anointed pundits continue to focus on obscurities and to treat the
upcoming primaries and election as sporting events where rooting for the home
team is nothing short of the American way, voters can and will simply tune out
the noise and find their news and information elsewhere.
It was the largely the press fixation on minutia,
rather than substance, that led to the disastrous Bush presidency in the first
place. It mattered little in press coverage that
candidate Bush was quite clearly unable to string a complete sentence together. His family credentials were good. "He'd be great
to have a beer with. And the other guy flip-flopped.... Not to mention what
those Swift-Boaters said. And those values voters sure do hate the other guy
..."
Over the last eight years, America has grown
quite a bit wiser, and the stakes are regrettably quite a bit higher. The media's relentless spinning and dumbing-down
of the political discourse no longer will cut it. It simply is not responsive to the seriousness of
the moment.
There are viable information alternatives. And so... America has apparently begun its embrace of "the
blogosphere" and other online resources.
http://wiselaw.blogspot.com/2007/11/clinton-remains-ahead-in-polls-despite.html
Help the most successful third party in the nation, The
Libertarian Party. The party has won
a full
third of the races that we've entered.
FROM
THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY:
Dear
Libertarian,
We're down to the final hours before the polls open
tomorrow morning. Around the nation, we are fielding over
150 Libertarian candidates in 2007. Already this year,
in races that have already been decided, we've won a
full third of the races that we've entered.
While no minor party
has won a federal race since 1914, Libertarians have been
very successful on the local level for many years. Around
the county you'll find our principled members currently
serving as mayors, town council members and sheriffs, and we
even have a superior court judge.
That's why off-year elections are so important to
the LP.
We need your help more than ever, right
now.
There are several ways to help the
Libertarian Party as we near an important Election Day:
•
Volunteer your time with the LP Ballot
Base. You can make calls to get out the vote for select
Libertarian candidates from the comfort of your own
home. To register, go to
www.ballotbase.org today. With only hours remaining
before the polls open, this is a very positive
way to help your party!
•
Make a contribution! With continuing
and growing ballot access hurdles, operational costs and
a great opportunity ahead in 2008, we need your
financial assistance. Please
click here to make a one-time donation, or, to help
on an ongoing basis, please
click here to establish a monthly donation. While
there are many causes to give to, especially with the
excitement of the 2008 presidential elections, the
Libertarian Party, which has fought for Liberty
for over 35 years, still needs your help.
Please give today and give generously.
• If you
haven't already done so, become an official
member of the Libertarian Party. We have made
significant progress in growing our membership roles and
size of our party this year (increasing over 25%), but
we can do better. While we have nearly 80,000
subscribers to our e-mail list, we have less than 15,000
active, dues-paying members. If you are not yet
a member of the LP, please
click here today and join. With your
membership, you'll receive an attractive and
personalized membership card along with a subscription
to our publication, LP News. Please join today, as it's
a significant step to increasing the size and abilities
of the Libertarian Party.
Our Party of Principle is on the right
track, and we can continue progress with your help. Around
the nation, Americans are waking up to our message of
Liberty, and they are finding a home with us.
As an example, take a look at the latest issue of Time
Magazine. Within the letters to the editor section,
you'll find the spontaneous response from Libertarians
around the country who came to defend and define our shared
libertarian message. Here's a
quick link to the article along with
our response.
Thank you for taking the time to read this message, and
please take the time to help your party today by donating
either your
money or
your time.
In Liberty,
Shane Cory
Executive Director
Libertarian National Committee
P.S. Remember, if you are not yet an official member of the
LP,
click here today or give us a call at 1-800-Elect-Us.
Libertarian Party
Help John
Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
Want to help our campaign for John Edwards? Send money and check out
these powerful 60 seconds from John Edwards about why he is running for
president—and help us get this spot on the air in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Click here to
see our "Heroes" television spot.
Over the past two weeks, thousands of people took up our challenge of raising
$500,000 online by October 31—and because of their support, we can start airing
this spot in Iowa today.
Now, we're asking you to help us keep it running. Your contribution today will
allow us to keep this ad on the air for an extended period—and to air it in
other critical key states. A contribution of just $50 will help us meet this
goal.
So please consider helping us extend the run of this powerful spot, and spread
John's message of big, bold change to voters in key early states.
Click here to
see our "Heroes" television spot.
With less than 65 days to go before the first contest is held, we're on the road
to victory. But we need your help in this final stretch. Please give what you
can today, and help us keep John's powerful message on the air.
Sincerely,
--David Bonior
National Campaign Manager, John Edwards for President
November 1, 2007
Hillary will not return much of Hsu's illegal campaign donations
Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions
from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu. Special Interest
groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to
Presidential candidates. New
Mexico's State workers love Governor
Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign. Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president?
Iraq Good New. Defeated terrorists seek refuge in Afghanistan
And Other Areas.
Help the most successful third party in the nation, The
Libertarian Party. The party has won
a full
third of the races that we've entered.
Polls prove Democrat voters want Hillary and
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Democrats are now too smart to think
illegal immigration matters.
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Special Interest
groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to
Presidential candidates.
New Mexico's State
workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's
presidential campaign.
Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Can religious
bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president?.
Iraq Good New.
Defeated terrorists seek refuge in Afghanistan And Other Areas.
Tom McMahon wants
you at a democratic party in November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a
democratic party president.
Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video..
Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to
refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Christopher Dodd
,Barack Obama
,Duncan Hunter
,Election 2008
,Democratic Party,Fred Thompson
,Democratic,Hillary Clinton
,democrat,John McCain
,John Edwards
,Joe Biden
,politician,Republican,Presidential candidates
,Republican Party,Rudy Giuliani
,x6,x5,Tom Tancredo,x3,x2,x1
Tancredo, illegal campaign donations,
Democrat voters, Democrat voters,
driver's licenses for illegal aliens, NARAL,
Kate Michelman, feminist group,
XSHOP17, XSHOP16,
XSHOP15, XSHOP14,
XSHOP13, XSHOP12,
New Mexico, XSHOP10,
Governor Richardson, Mitt Romney, Mormon,
Libertarian Party, XSHOP5, XSHOP4,
XSHOP3, XSHOP2,
XSHOP1
News note 1 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John McCain Mitt Romney, Tom
Tancredo, Fred Thompson and_even_more_coming
Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to
refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
October 17, 2007
WASHINGTON -- Hillary Rodham Clinton was forced
ro return more than $800,000 in contributions donated to her presidential
campaign arranged by an alleged swindler Norman Hsu. But her campaign
officials said Tuesday they had no plans to return more than $260,000 that
many of the same donors gave to her Senate political accounts. Illegal
donations from suspected criminals are totally reasonable for Senators.
Officials said they would not return those contributions unless the
individual contributor asks for the money. A Los Angeles Times analysis
found that 77 donors whose contributions to the presidential campaign were
returned last month also had given similar donations to Clinton's two
Senate-related political funds.
Her Senate campaign committee, Friends of Hillary, received $235,000 in
donations from the 77 donors later linked to Hsu. Ten of those contributors
gave an additional $28,000 to Clinton's leadership political fund, HillPac.
In September, Clinton announced that she would return all donations to her
presidential campaign that were connected to Hsu, who had been one of her
most valued fundraisers, she did NOT say she would return all the Hsu money
that helped her become Senator. She only made the decision on the
Presidential campaign funds after reports in The Times that Hsu was a
fugitive from a 1991 fraud charge, that he had been pressing some of his
investors to contribute to the senator, and that the FBI was looking into
his investment schemes.
The refunds to 249 individual donors were intended to show Clinton's effort
to sever connections with Hsu, who has since been charged by federal
prosecutors with swindling more than $60 million from investors nationwide.
Clinton nonetheless has no plans to sever connections with the Hsu money
that helped make her a Senator.
Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson excused keeping the $260,000
saying "Because we did not keep track of contributions in the same way
during the Senate campaign we have no basis for knowing that these
individuals were solicited by Norman Hsu," He said the Clinton campaign
had gone beyond what it was legally bound to do when it gave back the
presidential contributions. He also said he thought Hillary's campaign
was behaving ethically by keeping the Hsu money.
"Out of an abundance of caution, we went above and beyond and made a
decision to return all contributions credited to Mr. Hsu
for the presidential campaign,"
Wolfson said. "We were not obligated to do so, and in fact other campaigns
have chosen to keep contributions in similar situations."
Hsu was virtually unknown in the political world before 2004. But he
established himself with Clinton and other Democrats by his ability to help
campaigns meet a seemingly unending demand for contributions.
Federal law limits the amount any one individual can donate to a candidate
or party. But there is no limit on how much an individual can round up in
contributions from friends and associates, provided none exceed the
individual limit.
The combined contributions, which may add up to tens of thousands of
dollars, are typically then delivered to a favored politician as a bundle.
Hsu became one of the Democratic party's most prolific bundlers -- and his
ability to deliver earned him invitations to exclusive events with the
Clintons and other Democratic notables.
His ties to politicians may also have impressed potential investors in his
seemingly high-yield investment schemes. Late last month, U.S. Atty. Michael
J. Garcia of the southern district of New York unsealed a 16-page complaint
charging Hsu with mail fraud, wire fraud and violating the Federal Election
Campaign Act by reimbursing associates for their political donations. If
convicted, Hsu could face up to 45 years in jail.
Hsu remains in the San Mateo County Jail, where he is being held without
bail on the 1991 fraud charge, to which he earlier pleaded no contest. Hsu's
attorneys have recently asked the court to withdraw that plea, and they have
denied the wrongdoing alleged in the federal complaint.
Source:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clinton17oct17,1,3548334.story?coll=la-politics-campaign&ctrack=1&cset=true
Special Interest groups buy future
presidential access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates
Christopher Dodd
,Barack Obama
,Duncan Hunter
,Election 2008
,Democratic Party,Fred Thompson
,Democratic,Hillary Clinton
,democrat,John McCain
,John Edwards
,Joe Biden
,politician,Republican,Presidential candidates
,Republican Party,Rudy Giuliani
,x6,x5,Tom Tancredo,x3,x2,x1
Tancredo, illegal campaign donations,
Democrat voters, Democrat voters,
driver's licenses for illegal aliens, NARAL,
Kate Michelman, feminist group,
XSHOP17, XSHOP16,
XSHOP15, XSHOP14,
XSHOP13, XSHOP12,
New Mexico, XSHOP10,
Governor Richardson, Mitt Romney, Mormon,
Libertarian Party, XSHOP5, XSHOP4,
XSHOP3, XSHOP2,
XSHOP1
News note 2 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John McCain Mitt Romney, Tom
Tancredo, Fred Thompson and_even_more_coming
Special Interest groups buy future presidential
access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates
US Presidential Candidates Collectively Raise Record Sum
By Jeffrey Young
Washington
17 October 2007
Watch Campaign Financing report / Windows Broadband - download

Watch Campaign Financing report / Windows Broadband 
Watch Campaign Financing report / Windows Dialup- download

Watch Campaign Financing report / Windows Dialup 
The total amount of money raised by the Democratic and Republican
presidential candidates may, by the time Election Day 2008 comes about,
approach or even break $1 billion. For just the first nine months of
2007, presidential candidates in the two major parties have already
collected a total of $415 million. In this segment of How America
Elects, VOA's Jeffrey Young looks at campaign financing and the
controversies surrounding it.
|
 |
|
Honor guard during an official ceremony on the
South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC |
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. is the most
expensive residential address in the United States. To win four years
of occupancy at the White House, both major political parties, the
Democratic and the Republican, are more than willing to raise hundreds
of millions of dollars in the fight for the presidency.
And in each new presidential race, the sums rocket even
higher. Total contributions to both Democratic and Republican Party
presidential candidates went from $135 million in 1992 to $671 million
in 2004.
Analyst Brian Darling at the conservative research
organization
The
Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. explains why the two major
parties need to raise huge sums to compete with each other. "The
advertisements that cost millions of dollars to run, be it radio or TV,
the traveling expenses throughout the country - - it's going to cost a
lot of money for these candidates to travel on a daily basis, and also
the massive campaign organizations that these candidates need to put
together,” he said.
At the start of the 1970s, Congress enacted laws that
led to the creation of the
Federal Election
Commission. FEC Spokesman Bob Biersack outlines its oversight role.
He says, "If you want to run for President of the United States, you are
required to comply with a series of laws including restrictions on how
money is raised, and how it is spent and used in those campaigns."
Current federal regulations limit presidential candidate
contributions from individuals to $2,300, with organizations limited to
$5,000.
|
 |
|
With each new presidential race the sums rocket
even higher |
The Federal Election Commission requires that candidates
file quarterly reports listing both contributions and expenses. These
records are open to the public, including on the Internet.
Laura MacCleery is with an independent advocacy group
called
Public Citizen in Washington, D.C. She recounts how the public
pressed Congress in the 1970s for an alternative to traditional
presidential campaign fundraising. "So, one of the things that happened
was that they [Congress] established the presidential public funding
system for campaigns."
But in the 2000 and 2004 presidential races, the
Democratic and Republican Parties chose not to accept public funding,
allowing them to spend without restriction. The same is expected to
happen in the 2008 White House contest.
But some Americans, including Laura MacCleery at Public
Citizen, want presidential campaign donations done away with entirely.
MacCleery says, "The ultimate solution, of course, is public funding of
elections, and that is what we are pushing for next."
Others say that giving money to political candidates is
part of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment right of free speech,
and cannot be eliminated. And as November 2008 gets closer, the
campaign contribution cash piles will continue to grow.
New Mexico's State workers love Governor
Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
Christopher Dodd
,Barack Obama
,Duncan Hunter
,Election 2008
,Democratic Party,Fred Thompson
,Democratic,Hillary Clinton
,democrat,John McCain
,John Edwards
,Joe Biden
,politician,Republican,Presidential candidates
,Republican Party,Rudy Giuliani
,x6,x5,Tom Tancredo,x3,x2,x1
Tancredo, illegal campaign donations,
Democrat voters, Democrat voters,
driver's licenses for illegal aliens, NARAL,
Kate Michelman, feminist group,
XSHOP17, XSHOP16,
XSHOP15, XSHOP14,
XSHOP13, XSHOP12,
New Mexico, XSHOP10,
Governor Richardson, Mitt Romney, Mormon,
Libertarian Party, XSHOP5, XSHOP4,
XSHOP3, XSHOP2,
XSHOP1
News note 3 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John McCain Mitt Romney, Tom
Tancredo, Fred Thompson and_even_more_coming
New Mexico's State workers love Governor
Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
State workers a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
By The Associated Press
Article Launched: 10/17/2007 07:07:56 AM MDT
SANTA FE — State workers in New Mexico continue to pump money into Gov.
Bill Richardson's presidential bid, giving his campaign about $78,000
during the past three months.
State employees have given more to Richardson's campaign than any
other group of individuals when totaled by their employer, according to
a review of campaign finance records by The Associated Press.
Since launching his campaign for the Democratic presidential
nomination, Richardson has collected at least $468,101 from state
employees, including those working for executive branch agencies,
courts, other state offices and publicly funded colleges and
universities. That represents about 2.5 percent of the $18.5 million in
total contributions received by Richardson so far.
At the end of September, Richardson had a balance of about $5.8
million in his campaign account.
Among the state officials giving to Richardson during the third
quarter were Lt. Gov. Diane Denish, $2,300; Higher Education Secretary
Reed Dasenbrock, $2,300; Tourism Secretary Michael Cerletti, $2,000;
John Bigelow, who runs the Public Defender Department, $2,300; and Roy
Soto, who is in charge of the Department of Information Technology,
$2,300.
Contributors described as self-
employed gave nearly $830,000 to the campaign during the third
quarter, bringing their year-to-date total to about $3.4
million.
Retirees contributed about $614,000 during the past three
months, bringing their campaign-to-date total to about $1.9
million.
Published reports about Richardson's campaign contributors
often focus only on individuals whose employer is listed as the
"state of New Mexico." In the third quarter, those donors gave
$39,600. However, that understates the money coming state
employees.
Richardson's campaign report lists contributions from state
workers with dozens of different descriptions of their employers
— ranging from "New Mexico Department of Public Safety" to "NM
DOT" for the state Transportation Department.
New Mexico is the largest source of campaign cash for
Richardson.
During the third quarter, donors from New Mexico contributed
about $1 million.
New Mexicans — individuals and political committees based in
the state — have given $5.2 million since the campaign started.
That represents about 28 percent of the total contributions to
Richardson.
Workers for Richardson's presidential campaign committee
contributed $8,190 during the third quarter. David Contarino, of
Santa Fe, who is the campaign manager, gave $2,300 and that
brought his total contributions to $4,600 — the maximum amount
for the primary and general elections.
Lawyers with the New Mexico-based Modrall, Sperling law firm
contributed $8,600 during the past three months to Richardson.
Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chavez, who is running for the
Democratic nomination for Senate, contributed $2,300 to
Richardson's campaign and Albuquerque city employees gave
$4,000.
New Mexico Indian tribes and pueblos contributed $10,500 to
the campaign during the past three months. Giving $2,300 were
Pojoaque, Tesuque and Zia pueblos and the Jicarilla Apache
Nation. Sandia Pueblo contributed $1,300.
Polls
agree Richardson is the one Democratic candidate that Democrats,
independents and Republicans would most likely vote for.
I
don't know if you did, but I stayed up late Tuesday night
watching election returns. As someone who has been in public
life a long time, I find Election Day really inspiring.
It's the day when the talking heads don't matter anymore and the
workings of the world's greatest democracy are on display for
all to see. And if you're running for office, it's the day you
finally stop campaigning, plunk down in front of the television,
and find out just how good a job you did.The wonderful thing
about our country is that even after the electoral disasters of
2000 and 2004, it has a way of correcting itself -- of kicking
the bums out and getting back on track. We saw that in
2006 when we took back Congress. We're going to see more of it
in 2008. Shoot, we saw it Tuesday when Kentucky voters booted
out their Republican Governor after he was indicted for
political interference in state hiring.
But what worries me when I think about the 2008 election is that
if we nominate the wrong candidate, we're not going to win the
White House.
You've seen how the national Republican Party operates.
They're masters at destroying our candidates through smear
campaigns and distortions. They've already got their long knives
out for Senator Clinton -- a person I admire even though I
disagree with her on many important issues.
The best we can hope for if she is the nominee is another
squeaker that could go one way or the other.
I don't think this country can afford another George Bush.
The polls are all in agreement. I'm the one Democratic
candidate that Democrats, independents and Republicans would
most likely vote for. That means that if I'm the candidate,
we've got our best shot at taking back the White House.
I know I put the arm on you last week, but this whole
election comes down to what we can do in Iowa and New Hampshire
in the next 55 days. Every dollar of support you can give us
will go instantly into our media and field operations in those
key states.
So if you can find a way to contribute today, I would be
incredibly grateful to you.
I've got to go catch a plane. Please keep paying attention to
the news, keep talking to your friends about why you support my
candidacy, and keep being the true-blue Democrat you are. This
country needs more people like you.
I'll be in touch.
Bill
P.S. You may have heard talk about me giving up the
presidential race to run for either Senator from New Mexico or
Vice President. Don't you believe it. I'm in this race until the
end.
And thanks again for your support.
Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are
the best buyers of political power
Christopher Dodd
,Barack Obama
,Duncan Hunter
,Election 2008
,Democratic Party,Fred Thompson
,Democratic,Hillary Clinton
,democrat,John McCain
,John Edwards
,Joe Biden
,politician,Republican,Presidential candidates
,Republican Party,Rudy Giuliani
,x6,x5,Tom Tancredo,x3,x2,x1
Tancredo, illegal campaign donations,
Democrat voters, Democrat voters,
driver's licenses for illegal aliens, NARAL,
Kate Michelman, feminist group,
XSHOP17, XSHOP16,
XSHOP15, XSHOP14,
XSHOP13, XSHOP12,
New Mexico, XSHOP10,
Governor Richardson, Mitt Romney, Mormon,
Libertarian Party, XSHOP5, XSHOP4,
XSHOP3, XSHOP2,
XSHOP1
News note 4 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John McCain Mitt Romney, Tom
Tancredo, Fred Thompson and_even_more_coming
Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best
buyers of political power
Donor Bundling
Emerges As Major Ill in '08 Race
New Campaign Favorite
Spins More Cash, Abuse;
Lawyers Back Edwards
By
BRODY MULLINS
October 18, 2007; Page A1
WASHINGTON -- The bundling of political donations once was an
innocuous play in the game book of Washington political operatives. Now, the
fund-raising practice has grown so widespread, and some of its practitioners so
brazen, that bundling has become the chief source of abuse in the American
campaign-finance system.
The strange case of Norman Hsu, the
textile-importer-turned-fugitive who cobbled together $800,000 in contributions
for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign, is the tip of the
iceberg. Candidates for offices from county commissioner to U.S. president are
increasingly turning to bundlers -- individuals who ask friends, family and
business associates for contributions to their candidate of choice -- to help
bring in the tremendous amounts of cash now needed to wage political campaigns.
The number of bundlers working for presidential campaigns has
nearly doubled since the last election, according to a Wall Street Journal
analysis of data from campaigns and watchdog groups. The volume of cash they
funnel to individual campaigns, as a percentage of all money raised, has soared
as well. Bundled donations account for more than one-quarter of presidential
campaign contributions this year, up from 8% in the 2000 race.
Bundling is legal and has been around for years, but new forces
have turned it into an election-season cornerstone. Campaign costs have surged,
with each candidate's viability increasingly measured by their ability to raise
cash. Recent finance reforms have closed old avenues for individuals to make big
donations, making stars out of connected fund-raisers who can coax small
donations from a broad network of names. Campaigns encourage ambitious bundling
by rewarding top fund-raisers with perks, including access to candidates.
Knowledge about these bundlers is limited, however, because
candidates aren't required to disclose information about them. While some
campaigns honor bundlers by name on their Web sites or disclose the total number
of bundlers working for them, others guard their identities.
In this high-pressure, low-disclosure environment, the practice
has increasingly evolved into a method for disguising illegal donations. In
several cases already this year, campaign bundlers have admitted to making
contributions in the names of others to get around caps, or coercing employees
to give.
"The pressures of unlimited, arms-race spending has put the
highest premium on presidential candidates finding bundlers who can raise huge
amounts of money and the lowest premium on filtering out problematic bundlers,"
says Fred Wertheimer, the president of Democracy 21, a nonpartisan
Washington-based group dedicated to reducing the influence of money in politics.
"This has opened the door to anything-goes bundlers pursuing anything-goes fund
raising."
Last month, Mr. Hsu was charged with surpassing the legal
limits on his own contributions by secretly reimbursing others for the donations
he bundled together. Wisconsin developer Dennis Troha has pled guilty for
repaying others for their donations to both Democrats and Republicans. Last
week, the former chairman of Miami-based engineering firm PBS&J Corp. pled
guilty in federal court in Florida for crimes related to funneling $200,000 to
$400,000 in illegal donations to congressional candidates from Florida to
Alaska.
More Than 2,000
For a closer look at the personalities behind this season's
flow of campaign cash, The Wall Street Journal analyzed data provided by the
Democratic and Republican presidential campaigns. The Journal also commissioned
data and analysis from two nonpartisan groups that track money in politics.
According to a study by one of the groups, Washington-based Public Citizen, the
number of bundlers in presidential races has reached 2,045 so far in the 2008
election, up from 1,173 in the 2004 election. There were 269 in 2000.
Bundlers raised at least $109 million for the presidential
candidates during the first nine months of the 2008 campaign. That figure is
based on the number of bundlers that Public Citizen says raised money for each
campaign, multiplied by the minimum amount that campaigns and fund-raisers say
they are required to bring in to be considered bundlers. The actual share
contributed by bundlers is likely higher, because top practitioners raise far
more than the minimum -- nearly $1 million in Mr. Hsu's instance.
The funds bundled so far this election cycle represent at least
28% of the record $379 million raised overall for this campaign. By comparison,
figures compiled by Public Citizen show bundlers accounted for 18% of funds
raised in the 2004 contest, and 8% in 2000.
A name-by-name analysis of bundlers reveals that this year's
operatives are drawn from the same pools as fund-raisers past. Lawyers account
for about 27% of the bundlers named by Public Citizen, according to an analysis
of that list conducted for the Journal by the Washington-based Center for
Responsive Politics. Another 11% work in securities and investment and 8% in
real estate. Lobbyists account for about 3% of these fund-raisers. The Center
for Responsive Politics said it couldn't determine the occupations of 15% of the
bundlers named by Public Citizen.
Global law firm DLA Piper is home to five presidential
bundlers, including three for Mrs. Clinton, the analysis reveals. Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLC employs five, two of them for Democrat Sen. Barack
Obama. Finance, too, has its voice: Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. each employ five bundlers. Other Wall Street
players with multiple bundlers include J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc.
and
Credit Suisse Group. The entertainment industry accounts for about 4% of the
bundlers for the presidential campaign -- predominantly for Democrats --
including five at
DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc.
Shared Ideology
Bundlers for major campaigns say they're following the rules.
They're motivated by a shared ideology with their candidates and a desire to see
them win. "The way I see it, there are two elections. The first is how many
people are willing to dig into their pocketbooks to finance a candidate," says
Domino's Pizza CEO David Brandon, a bundler for Republican Mitt Romney.
The bundling boom is partly an unintended consequence of prior
stabs at reform. In 1974, lawmakers responded to Watergate-era political abuses
by limiting the amount of money any individual can give. At the same time, to
help lower the cost of campaigns and reduce reliance on private donors, the
federal government offered to match money raised by a campaign with public
funds, provided the candidates agreed to a federal spending limit.
In the history of campaign-finance law, well-intentioned
efforts to curb abuses in one area typically open the door to those in another.
The Watergate-era reforms prompted an explosion of political-action committees,
which had much higher limits on how much they could receive from individuals and
dole out to campaigns. PACs became the new conduit for big cash.
Meanwhile, campaign budgets ballooned. In 1976, $300 million
was spent on candidates for Congress and the White House, according to the
Federal Election Commission. Since then, the cost of campaigns has grown by
about 40% every four-year election cycle. The 2008 elections are expected to
cost $6 billion in all -- with the presidential contest, for the first time,
expected to exceed $1 billion.
By the late 1990s, presidential hopefuls were chafing at the
federal spending limits. In 1999, George W. Bush announced he would opt out of
the federal system -- the first major presidential candidate to do so since the
program was introduced 25 years earlier. His decision freed his campaign from
spending limitations, but increased the pressure to raise private money to
offset the waived federal funds.
Retooled Strategy
Mr. Bush retooled his strategy. As governor of Texas, he had
cultivated donors who contributed $100,000 or more to his campaigns. (Texas law
doesn't limit campaign contributions from individuals.) But when Mr. Bush began
his first presidential campaign, those donors were forbidden under federal law
at the time from giving more than $1,000. Mr. Bush created a program that
rewarded individuals who brought $100,000 or more to his campaign, in increments
of $1,000 or less.
He named the supporters "Pioneers," publicizing their names on
his Web site and inviting them to private campaign events and strategy sessions.
A tracking number was attached to the donations channeled by each Pioneer to the
campaign, allowing the Bush team to tally the haul of each and foster
competition among them. Mr. Bush recruited about 250 bundlers who raised at
least $25 million of the $100 million he raised for the 2000 race.
Unintended Consequence
Bundling received another, if unintentional, boost in 2002.
That year's McCain-Feingold Act banned corporations, unions and others from
making large donations, known as "soft money," to the Democratic and Republican
parties. Most of this soft money had been spent on behalf of the parties'
presidential and congressional candidates, so the new law effectively closed the
avenue that high-rolling campaign donors had used to skirt individual campaign
limits. The rule also doubled the limits on individual donations to $2,000 for a
primary election and another $2,000 for the general election for congressional
and presidential candidates. (The limit is currently $2,300 per candidate per
election.)
In the 2004 election, both President Bush and his Democratic
challenger, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, declined matching funds. Had they
accepted federal money, they would have received $17 million each and been
limited to spending roughly $44 million. Mr. Kerry went on to raise $215
million, and Mr. Bush raised $259 million. Each used networks of more than 500
bundlers, according to Public Citizen.
This season, nearly every major presidential candidate has
declined public funding and relies heavily on bundlers.
Mrs. Clinton's campaign has awarded the title "HillRaiser" to
the 223 bundlers it says have channeled $100,000 or more her way. That means the
campaign's bundlers account for at least $22.3 million, or about 28%, of the
$80.1 million that public records show it has raised through Sept. 30.
HillRaisers include movie producer Steven Spielberg, supermarket billionaire Ron
Burkle and former Democratic vice presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro.
Sluggers and MVPs
Among Republicans, Rudy Giuliani gives baseball-themed titles
-- "Sluggers," "MVPs" -- to those who have pledged to raise $25,000 to $1
million for his campaign. He sends an eight-page brochure to prospective
bundlers that lists the perks for successive fund-raising levels. Those in the
lowest tier, "Pitcher," get a password to a members-only campaign Web site and
are included in a monthly conference call with Mr. Giuliani and senior staffers,
the brochure says. For $1 million, "Team Captains" can golf with Mr. Giuliani
and join him for dinner and cigars. Mr. Giuliani's bundlers include New York
Yankees vice president Abel Guerra, Texas Rangers owner Thomas Hicks Jr. and
Wall Street financier Carl Icahn.
Bundlers acknowledge that many people raise cash for campaigns
to advance their own agendas -- from influencing public policy decisions to
gaining ambassadorships or positions in a new administration. The measure of the
bundler is the ability to bring in money, they say, now that campaigns and media
alike use quarterly fund-raising results as a yardstick of success.
Some say this opens the door to abuse. "Whenever you have a lot
of pressure to raise a lot of money there are going to be people who cut
corners," says David Mason, a Republican member of the Federal Election
Commission.
A Clinton fund-raising event earlier this year illustrates how
campaign deadlines, and bundlers' desire to win favor, can mix. William
Danielczyk, a Clinton fund-raiser who runs a northern Virginia private-equity
fund, says he wanted to plan an event for Mrs. Clinton in April. "We were
encouraged to do it in March," he says, so the funds would be reported under the
campaign's first-quarter results.
Mrs. Clinton was then considered the front-runner in a race
with Mr. Obama and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards for the Democratic
nomination. Political analysts were looking for her to demonstrate her strength
by out-raising her rivals in the first quarter.
Mr. Danielczyk and Mrs. Clinton agreed to schedule a
fund-raiser for late March at the Clintons' Washington home. Campaign-finance
reports show that in the days around the event, Mr. Danielczyk's employees and
family members contributed more than $100,000 to the Clinton campaign.
Nearly half of the money came from individuals who are
Republican voters, according to election records. One of those, Pamela Layton,
said that she and her husband, who is the director of information technology at
Mr. Danielczyk's private equity firm, were reimbursed for the $4,600 apiece they
donated to Mrs. Clinton. Mr. Danielczyk denied that he reimbursed anyone for
donations. After the reimbursement was reported last month by the Journal, the
Clinton campaign returned the Laytons' donations and said it would contact all
of the Danielczyk contributors to confirm that they had donated their own money.
"Bundling by its very nature has the potential to be coercive,"
says Craig McDonald, the executive director of Texans for Public Justice, a
nonprofit organization that tracks bundlers for Mr. Bush. "The money often comes
from people who don't want anything except to please their boss."
The dynamic extends to local campaigns. After a top executive
of an Ohio company called Check 'n Go sent emails asking employees to give at
least $200 to a hopeful in a local race, one employee quit. "We were told that
this was voluntary, but our understanding was that a failure to do so would
impact our careers," said the employee, Michael Donovan, a district director of
operations.
Yancy Deering, a spokesman for CNG Financial Corp., Check 'n
Go's parent, said "the company does not consider political contributions when
evaluating employee performance or otherwise making employment decisions."
Mr. Edwards has been burned twice by fund-raisers at law firms,
who account for at least 54% of his bundlers, according to the analysis
conducted for the Journal. The Edwards campaign considers anyone who raises
money outside of their families a bundler.
This year, in Michigan, attorney Geoffrey Fieger was indicted
for illegally reimbursing employees for $127,000 in bundled campaign
contributions to Mr. Edwards's 2004 presidential campaign. Prosecutors alleged
that Mr. Fieger and a law partner reimbursed 60 employees and associates for
donations to the campaign by disguising the reimbursements as bonuses or other
payments.
Last year, the Federal Election Commission fined the Edwards
campaign $9,500 as part of a separate instance of straw donations from a Little
Rock, Ark., law firm. The FEC also fined the law firm and partner Tab Turner
$50,000 for reimbursing low-level employees for donations to Mr. Edwards. Mr.
Turner says he has settled with the FEC. The Edwards campaign declined to
comment.
First Step
This summer, Congress took a tentative first step toward
cracking down on bundling by requiring candidates for both houses of Congress to
make public the names of top fund-raisers who are also registered lobbyists.
That law will not apply to presidential candidates.
Momentum is also growing for legislation that would raise the
amount of public funds that candidates can access, in order to reduce the
pressure to raise cash from individuals. A bill in the Senate, which is backed
by Mr. Obama, would triple the spending limits for presidential candidates in
important early states. Several Democratic candidates, including Mrs. Clinton
and Mr. Edwards, have said they would support an overhaul in general.
Bundling's potential abuses also have spread to local races,
where practitioners may enjoy concentrated influence. Wisconsin developer Mr.
Troha began raising money for federal and state lawmakers in 2002. At the time,
Mr. Troha, who made his money in the truck-leasing business, was the leader of
an investor group that wanted to build an $800 million casino in the state. To
move ahead, the group needed approval from the Bush administration and
Wisconsin's Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle.
Mr. Doyle was elected governor in 2002 with 45% of the vote in
a three-way race. In 2005, as he prepared for re-election, one of his campaign
aides asked Mr. Troha to help raise money, prosecutors said in an indictment
handed up in March in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin.
Mr. Troha had already donated $10,000 to Mr. Doyle, the maximum
allowed by state law. Prosecutors charged that a few days before the June 30,
2005, fund-raising deadline, eight members of Mr. Troha's family wrote campaign
contributions totaling $47,500 for the governor.
About the same time, Mr. Troha wrote a check for $50,000 to a
company he owned, according to the court documents. A few days later, that
company issued "loan" checks to the eight people for the amount of their
campaign donations. The indictment says the family members didn't return the
loans until the Federal Bureau of Investigation began looking into Mr. Troha's
contributions earlier this year.
By early 2007, the Bush administration had given initial
approval to the casino plan. Mr. Doyle remained neutral toward his top
fund-raiser's project. In March, Mr. Troha was indicted for the illegal
contributions and stepped down from the group.
Plea Agreement
Mr. Troha reached a plea agreement with prosecutors this
summer, admitting to funneling illegal donations in earlier years to the
gubernatorial account of the Democratic National Committee and to the Bush
campaign. He didn't address the 2005 donations to Mr. Doyle and others. His
attorney didn't comment on the original indictment's broader charges, saying it
was overtaken by the plea agreement.
Mr. Bush and the lawmakers who received donations from Mr.
Troha and his fund-raising network have returned the donations or given them to
charity.
Gov. Doyle, re-elected in November 2006, kept the money. "My
campaign was aware of nothing to suggest that the contributions received from
Mr. Troha were in any way inappropriate or unlawful," Gov. Doyle said in a
prepared statement. "In fact, by all appearances, they were indistinguishable
from the many contributions received by countless campaigns, Democratic and
Republican, across the state."
Write to Brody Mullins at
brody.mullins@wsj.com
RELATED ARTICLES AND BLOGS
Related Articles from the Online Journal
Blog Posts About This Topic
Religious bigots will not accept the Mormon
Mitt Romney as president
News note 5 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John McCain Mitt Romney, Tom
Tancredo, Fred Thompson and_even_more_coming
Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney
as president?
Mitt Romney wants you to look at him and think: strong leader, successful
businessman, good father, faithful husband.
He does not want you to look at him and think: Mormon.
He is a Mormon, and he is proud of it. He says his faith has shaped his life and
his values. But he doesn’t want religion to be the prism through which people
view him.
“The people I speak with in crowds overwhelmingly tell me they want a person of
faith to lead the country,” he told me earlier this year. “They don’t care what
brand of faith that is, so long as we share values.”
It may be Americans truly don’t care what brand of faith their presidents are,
but they sure seem to choose from a highly limited range: the conventional
branches of Protestantism and, once, a Catholic.
And the polls are pretty chilling. Consider this from Gallup: “Gallup polls
found 37 percent of churchgoing Protestants saying they would not vote for a
qualified Mormon candidate for president. Churchgoing Protestants did not show
similar opposition to voting for either a Catholic or a Jewish presidential
candidate.”
Also, a recent Newsweek poll found that 28 percent of Americans would not vote
for a Mormon for president.
Romney staffers tell me these polls are not relevant, because they ask voters an
abstract question about whether they would vote for “a Mormon” instead of asking
something like: “Would you vote for a former governor with a proven record of
leadership and accomplishment who happens to be a Mormon?”
And much of the problem may be, as some in the Romney campaign say, that most
Americans simply don’t know anything about Mormonism.
Shortly before Romney announced for president, USA Today ran an article saying
Mormonism was a religion “that has an unusual theology and a past scarred by
racism and polygamy.”
Recently, The New York Times wrote: “Among the major differences with
traditional Christianity: Mormons do not believe in the concept of the unified
Trinity; the Book of Mormon is considered to be sacred text, alongside the
Bible; and Mormons believe that God has a physical body and human beings can
eventually become like God.”
It is no secret that Romney’s opponents feel that even if he gets off to a good
start in Iowa, New Hampshire and Michigan, they will stop him in South Carolina,
where they think evangelical Christians will refuse to vote for a Mormon.
Romney benefited this week from the endorsement of Bob Jones III, chancellor of
the fundamentalist Christian Bob Jones University in Greenville, S.C., but it
was an endorsement that contained a downside as well as an upside.
“As a Christian, I am completely opposed to the doctrines of Mormonism,” Jones
told a reporter for the Greenville News. “But I’m not voting for a preacher. I’m
voting for a president.”
While some of Romney’s advisers feel the press has an unhealthy and biased
obsession with Romney’s religion, Romney spokesman Kevin Madden told me: “I
think it is a natural inquiry, whether it comes from voters or from reporters.
There is a unique angle to the governor, and his faith is something not a lot of
people know about. Tagg Romney (one of Romney’s five sons) said it best: ‘There
are really no unfair questions; that is up to the voters.’”
But should Romney help the voters along by giving a speech on the subject of his
religion, like John F. Kennedy famously did in 1960 about his Catholicism?
This is being hotly debated within the Romney campaign. Some see it as an
opportunity, while others feel it will merely increase the media’s obsession
(and alert even more people to the fact that Romney is a Mormon).
“The governor has said repeatedly that he is contemplating such a speech,”
Madden said, “but he has not made a decision whether definitely to do it or what
to say. It will much more likely be a personal decision than a political one. We
await the governor’s personal guidance.”
Another Romney staffer told me he has a speech already written.
It goes: “I am 60 years old. For my entire life, I have been a Mormon and an
American. I have never felt any conflict.”
SOURCE:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1007/6421.html
Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic
party in November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a democratic party
president
News note 7 for Election 2008, Presidential
candidates, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Christopher Dodd,
John Edwards, Barack Obama, Duncan Hunter, John
Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in
November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president
Dear Dicksguides,
We're just a little over a year away from electing a Democratic president.
We're kicking it all off with organizing events across the country, where
we'll be letting you in on the plan for taking back the White House. After
you learn the strategy, you'll start a conversation with your neighbors that
will help make sure your neighborhood is blue in 2008.
Do you have a few of hours to spare this Saturday? Sign up for an event in
your area now:
http://www.democrats.org/OneYearOut
We've spent the past three years building an unprecedented 50-state ground
operation, and we plan to use use cutting-edge technology and experienced
organizers to get out the vote next November. But the key to our
success has been grassroots support from people like you. Now we want to
share the plan for 2008 and how you're a part of it.
Attend an event in your neighborhood this weekend:
http://www.democrats.org/OneYearOut
No matter who the Democratic candidate is, they'll need the support of all
of us to win next November. We're starting early, and we won't stop until
there's a Democratic president. Thousands of people are already signed
up to attend events in their neighborhoods. Can you join them?
Sincerely,
Tom McMahon
Executive Director
Index of terms
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Special Interest
groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to
Presidential candidates.
New Mexico's State
workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's
presidential campaign.
Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Can religious
bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president?
Iraq Good New.
Defeated terrorists seek refuge in Afghanistan And Other Areas.
pro choice,anti life,XYZ3,XYZ2,
Barack Obama,
Biden,
Barack, x59,
John Edwards
Barack Obama
Rudy Giuliani
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Fred Thompson
anti-life,
Bill Richardson,
buyers of political power,
buying presidential access
Campaign Finances, Campaign fund
bundlers,
Christopher Dodd,
Clinton,
Democratic Party
Democratic,
Democratic Party, democrat,
Democrat voters,
Dodd, Norman Hsu, buying presidential access,
dicks, dick's, dicksguide, dicksguides, dicksguide, dicksguides.com, guide, guides,
driver's licenses for illegal
aliens,
Duncan Hunter,
Edwards, Election 2008,
feminist group
Fred Thompson,
Giuliani,
Governor Richardson,
Hillary Clinton,
Hunter,
Hsu
illegal campaign donations
John McCain,
John Edwards,
Joe Biden,
Libertarian Party
Mitt Romney,
Mormon Libertarian Party, XSHOP5,XSHOP10,
XSHOP4, XSHOP3, XSHOP2, XSHOP1
NARAL
New Mexico
News, ,Norman
Hsu
presidential access,
pro choice
politician, Presidential candidates,
religious bigots, Richardson
Special Interest
Groups
Tom McMahon
Tom Tancredo,
feminist group,
XSHOP17, XSHOP16, XSHOP15, XSHOP14, XSHOP13, XSHOP12, x3,x2,x1,x6,x5,
Polls prove Democrat voters want Hillary and
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Democrats are now too smart to think
illegal immigration matters.
Former president
of the anti-life, pro choice feminist group NARAL,
Kate
Michelman, attacks Hillary, saying the sole woman Democrat hopeful raises 'white
flag' when pressed on issues and answers
Former president of the
feminist NARAL,
Kate
Michelman, attacks Hillary, saying the sole woman Democrat hopeful raises 'white
flag' when pressed on issues and answers.
Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney
as president
Help John
Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
Hillary will not return much of Hsu's .
Hillary
Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from
donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Special Interest
groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to
Presidential candidates.
New Mexico's State
workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's
presidential campaign.
Campaign Finances: Campaign fund
bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Democratic Party:
Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in November 2007
to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president.
Keywords and other sources
Tancredo, Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
illegal campaign donations, Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in
November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president
Democrat voters, Iraq Good New. Defeated terrorists seek refuge in
Afghanistan And Other Areas
Democrat voters, Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt
Romney as president?
driver's licenses for illegal aliens, Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the
best buyers of political power
NARAL, New Mexico's State workers love Governor
Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
Kate Michelman, Special Interest groups buy future presidential
access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates
feminist group, Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to
refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
XSHOP17, New Mexico's State workers love Governor
Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
XSHOP16, Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
XSHOP15, Special Interest groups buy future presidential
access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates
XSHOP14, Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in
November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president
XSHOP13, Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to
refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
XSHOP12, Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the
best buyers of political power
New Mexico, Iraq Good New. Defeated terrorists seek refuge in
Afghanistan And Other Areas
XSHOP10, Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt
Romney as president?
Governor Richardson, Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to
refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu.
Mitt Romney, Special Interest groups buy future presidential
access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates
Mormon, New Mexico's State workers love Governor Richardson
so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign
Libertarian Party, Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best
buyers of political power
XSHOP5, Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney
as president?
XSHOP4, Iraq Good New. Defeated terrorists seek refuge in
Afghanistan And Other Areas
XSHOP3, Tom McMahon wants you at a democratic party in
November 2007 to plan for the coming election of a democratic party president
XSHOP2, Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video.
XSHOP1, Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video. Hillary will not return much of Hsu's illegal campaign donations. Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu. Special Interest groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates.
New Mexico's State workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign.
Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
END: Can religious bigots accept the Mormon Mitt Romney as president Help John Edwards. Send money and watch Heroes video. Hillary will not return much of Hsu's illegal campaign donations. Hillary Clinton aide admits there are no plans to refund Senate contributions from donors linked to the felon, Norman Hsu. Special Interest groups buy future presidential access by giving one billion dollars to Presidential candidates.
New Mexico's State workers love Governor Richardson so much they are a top donor to Richardson's presidential campaign.
Campaign fund bundlers, like Hsu, now are the best buyers of political power.
Other online sources:
News.com,Christopher Dodd
.com,Barack Obama
.com,Duncan Hunter
.com,Election 2008
.com,Democratic Party.com,Fred Thompson
.com,Democratic.com,Hillary Clinton
.com,democrat.com,
John McCain
.com,John Edwards
.com,Joe Biden
.com,politician.com,Mitt Romney
.com,Republican.com,Presidential candidates
.com,Republican Party.com,Rudy Giuliani
.com,
x6.com,x5.com,Tom Tancredo.com,x3.com,x2.com,x1.com,News.net,Christopher Dodd
.net,Barack Obama
.net,
Duncan Hunter
.net,Election 2008
.net,Democratic Party.net,Fred Thompson
.net,Democratic.net,Hillary Clinton
.net,democrat.net,John McCain
.net,John Edwards
.net,
Joe Biden
.net,politician.net,Mitt Romney
.net,Republican.net,Presidential candidates
.net,Republican Party.net,Rudy Giuliani
.net,x6.net,x5.net,Tom Tancredo.net,x3.net,
x2.net,x1.net,News.org,Christopher Dodd
.org,Barack Obama
.org,Duncan Hunter
.org,Election 2008
.org,Democratic Party.org,Fred Thompson
.org,
Democratic.org,Hillary Clinton
.org,democrat.org,John McCain
.org,John Edwards
.org,Joe Biden
.org,politician.org,Mitt Romney
1.org,Republican.org,
Presidential candidates
.org,Republican Party.org,Rudy Giuliani
.org,x6.org,x5.org,Tom Tancredo.org,x3.org,x2.org,x1.org,
News.edu,Christopher Dodd
.edu,Barack Obama
.edu,Duncan Hunter
.edu,Election 2008
.edu,Democratic Party.edu,Fred Thompson
.edu,
Democratic.edu,Hillary Clinton
.edu,democrat.edu,John McCain
.edu,John Edwards
.edu,Joe Biden
.edu,politician.edu,Mitt Romney
.edu,
Republican.edu,Presidential candidates
.edu,Republican Party.edu,Rudy Giuliani
.edu,x6.edu,x5.edu,Tom Tancredo.edu,x3.edu,x2.edu,x1.edu,
News.info,Christopher Dodd
.info,Barack Obama
.info,Duncan Hunter
.info,Election 2008
.info,Democratic Party.info,Fred Thompson
.info,Democratic.info,
Hillary Clinton
.info,democrat.info,John McCain
.info,John Edwards
.info,Joe Biden
.info,politician.info,Mitt Romney
.info,Republican.info,Presidential candidates
.info,
Republican Party.info,Rudy Giuliani
.info,x6.info,x5.info,Tom Tancredo.info,x3.info,x2.info,x1.info,News.US,Christopher Dodd
.US,
Barack Obama
.US,Duncan Hunter
.US,Election 2008
.US,Democratic Party.US,Fred Thompson
.US,Democratic.US,Hillary Clinton
.US,democrat.US,John McCain
.US,
John Edwards
.US,Joe Biden
.US,politician.US,Mitt Romney
1.US,Republican.US,Presidential candidates
.US,Republican Party.US,Rudy Giuliani
.US,x6.US,x5.US,
Tom Tancredo.US,x3.US,x2.US,x1.US,
Other online shopping sources:
Tancredo.com,illegal campaign donations.com,Democrat voters.com,Democrat voters.com,driver's licenses for illegal aliens.com,
NARAL.com,Kate Michelman.com,feminist group.com,XSHOP17.com,XSHOP16.com,
XSHOP15.com,XSHOP14.com,XSHOP13.com,XSHOP12.com,New Mexico.com,
XSHOP10.com,Governor Richardson.com,Mitt Romney.com,Mormon.com,Libertarian Party.com,XSHOP5.com,
XSHOP4.com,XSHOP3.com,XSHOP2.com,XSHOP1.com,Tancredo.net,illegal campaign donations.net,
Democrat voters.net,Democrat voters.net,driver's licenses for illegal aliens.net,NARAL.net,Kate Michelman.net,feminist group.net,
XSHOP17.net,XSHOP16.net,XSHOP15.net,XSHOP14.net,XSHOP13.net,XSHOP12.net,
New Mexico.net,XSHOP10.net,Governor Richardson.net,Mitt Romney.net,Mormon.net,Libertarian Party.net,
XSHOP5.net,XSHOP4.net,XSHOP3.net,XSHOP2.net,XSHOP1.net,Tancredo.org,
illegal campaign donations.org,Democrat voters.org,Democrat voters.org,driver's licenses for illegal aliens.org,NARAL.org,Kate Michelman.org,
feminist group.org,XSHOP17.org,XSHOP16.org,XSHOP15.org,XSHOP14.org,XSHOP13.org,
XSHOP12.org,New Mexico1.org,XSHOP10.org,Governor Richardson.org,Mitt Romney.org,Mormon.org,
Libertarian Party.org,XSHOP5.org,XSHOP4.org,XSHOP3.org,XSHOP2.org,XSHOP1.org,
Tancredo.edu,illegal campaign donations.edu,Democrat voters.edu,Democrat voters.edu,driver's licenses for illegal aliens.edu,
NARAL.edu,Kate Michelman.edu,feminist group.edu,XSHOP17.edu,XSHOP16.edu,XSHOP15.edu,
XSHOP14.edu,XSHOP13.edu,XSHOP12.edu,New Mexico.edu,XSHOP10.edu,Governor Richardson.edu,
Mitt Romney.edu,Mormon.edu,Libertarian Party.edu,XSHOP5.edu,XSHOP4.edu,XSHOP3.edu,
XSHOP2.edu,XSHOP1.edu,Tancredo.info,illegal campaign donations.info,Democrat voters.info,Democrat voters.info,
driver's licenses for illegal aliens.info,NARAL.info,Kate Michelman.info,feminist group.info,XSHOP17.info,XSHOP16.info,
XSHOP15.info,XSHOP14.info,XSHOP13.info,XSHOP12.info,New Mexico.info,XSHOP10.info,
Governor Richardson.info,Mitt Romney.info,Mormon.info,Libertarian Party.info,XSHOP5.info,XSHOP4.info,
XSHOP3.info,XSHOP2.info,XSHOP1.info,Tancredo.US,illegal campaign donations.US,Democrat voters.US,
Democrat voters.US,driver's licenses for illegal aliens.US,NARAL.US,Kate Michelman.US,feminist group.US,XSHOP17.US,
XSHOP16.US,XSHOP15.US,XSHOP14.US,XSHOP13.US,XSHOP12.US,New Mexico1.US,
XSHOP10.US,Governor Richardson.US,Mitt Romney.US,Mormon.US,Libertarian Party.US,XSHOP5.US,XSHOP4.US,
XSHOP3.US,XSHOP2.US,XSHOP1.US
| |
































































|