Title:
Organize your neighbors to protect yourselves from government goons SIGN UP FOR, OR REMOVE YOURSELF FROM Dick's
Reports DISTRIBUTION AT mglennbeckrules@aol.com
or respond to this email
It
may be time for you, your neighbors and coworkers to get together to consider
the actions you might need to take to fight big government goons or rioting
illegal alien supporters. We know the SEIU has sent goons who have physically
attacked people protesting big government and big government spending. Recently
the SEIU sent hundreds of its members to terrorize the home and neighborhood of
a lawyer working for Bank of America. (For more information see
500
SEIU goons terrorize teenager in his home.).
This is not the first time Obama's supporters have terrorized neighborhoods.
We also know that violent
protestors have been - and will be - organized by groups supporting illegal
aliens. When is it OK to legally shoot or fight back against a vandal in your
neighborhood?
We also know that hateful websites, funded by people like George
Soros, have encouraged violence against those opposed to big government and big
government spending. A big government supporter, encouraged by a George
Soros website, bit off a man's finger.
Neighbors must get together to plan how to react to massive
invasions by big government supporting goons or rioters supporting illegal
aliens.
Individually we can not fight off
500 SEIU goons at our doorstep. We can not stop, alone, a mob of violent illegal
alien supporters. We can - with our neighbors - be ready to fight off the big
government goons. We also need to do research of local and state laws to find
out what we can legally do to fight those who invade our neighborhoods.
To share your
thoughts and join an ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
1-800-PetMeds - America's Pet Health Resource
3balls.com
9/11 store. Abacus24-7
- Printer Ink, Toner & More
You and your
neighbors (or coworkers) must determine what the laws allow you to do to protect
yourself, your family, your neighbors, your property and your coworkers or
employees. What can you legally do in your state and city or town. Can
homeowners or business owners shoot trespassers? Can neighbors? Will the police
lock up trespassers or rioters? Can mobs use bull horns and other actions to
disturb the peace and terrorize people in your neighborhood? Who are the
neighbors and coworkers who can most quickly react, with or without weapons, to
fight off the invaders? People need to get together with their neighbors and
coworkers to decide how to deal with armies of big government goons or rioters
for illegal aliens.
Some may feel
this is NOT required. Liberals and progressives and even their goons tend
to be cowards. A homeowner with a gun will send the SEIU goons and the illegal
alien supporting rioters running. A shot in the air will terrorize these
terrorists.
But, we must fear that if we react like this - without researching
what we can legally do - problems could occur. Actions like this, EVEN IF LEGAL
- will make the socialist democrats and their media pals scream to disarm
people. We need to make sure that whatever actions we take are legal in our
states and localities. To share your
thoughts and join an ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name.
Apple iPod Touch,
Bailey Banks & Biddle.
Bissell, Black & Decker,
Books, Bookstore:
cancer
Bookstore:
FDR and Hitler
I am a co-leader of
a neighborhood militia. We are heavily armed and have had discussions as to when
and how to defend our homes, families and neighborhood. It is not an easy task
to come up with an action plan. Basically, where I am currently, the local
authorities are unreliable at deterring violent crime. Just recently a home
invasion ended up with the beating of an elderly woman and her husband's death.
Police will tell you they are able to investigate your murder but are unable to
prevent it. So it is imperative that you be armed and know your state and local
laws.
In most areas your residence is your castle and you are allowed to be armed
on your property. I carry openly when at home, with a loaded magazine, but never
any cartridge in the chamber. As long as I do not flash my gun or threaten
anyone at the door, it is perfectly legal. When I go out, being in California,
I cannot carry a concealed sidearm. Carrying an unloaded weapon is legal openly
but pointless and invites harassment from over zealous police in my opinion, so
I don't bother. Instead I carry a 5 inch quick draw blade made by Benchmark (my
favorite but by no means the only option). As long as it is visible and not
concealed, it is legal.
Our militia does everything legal and we have a good relationship with the
local police. Many of us, including myself have taken CERT classes and are
known by officers as local disaster responders. Two in our group have trained
search and rescue dogs also.
For_God
OK OK Source and more
information: xcacx
To share your thoughts and join an
ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name.
Return to topReturn to Dick' Guides
OK OK Source and more
information: xcacx
To share your thoughts and join an
ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name.
Godless_Liberals
OK OK Source and more
information: xcacx
To share your thoughts and join an
ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name. Return to topReturn to Dick' Guides
Do_Not_Click_Here
OK OK Source and more
information: xcacx
To share your thoughts and join an
ongoing discussion about this send email to the editor at
Boomerlinocln@aol.com Let us know if
you want your comment published under your email name. Return to topReturn to Dick' Guides
Obama's "liberal" United States
government suggested Europe's Socialism
caused debt crisis would have minimal
impact on global growth.
Paradoxically, the Communist "free
enterprisers" in China take a more
pessimistic view, warning Socialist
Europe's failure would impact demand for
its exports and other regions would
suffer too.
The two countries, meeting in Beijing for high-level talks, set the differing tones as euro zone leaders sought to conquer doubts that they can cut fiscal deficits and stimulate growth to overcome the crisis. For obvious reasons, Obama's men could not admit that socialism is failing big time ion Europe.
Global markets have been gripped by fears that a debt crisis engulfing socialist Greece will spread to other highly indebted socialist nations, particularly in southern Europe, dragging down the continent's economy and hitting trade with the United States and Asia.
"The euro zone problems haven't been cleaned up yet," said Nagayuki Yamagishi, a strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities in Tokyo. "And even though the global economy is definitely showing more signs of recovery than it did 6 months ago, worry continues that the euro zone's woes from socialist overspending will put a brake on this growth."
Socialist Greece's prime minister on Sunday ruled out defaulting on payments or restructuring its debt and his Spanish less socialist counterpart vowed to push through an austerity plan despite socialist union threats to strike.
In Beijing, where officials from the world's No.1 and No.3 economies were meeting for U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, there were contrasting messages about the dangers Europe's woes posed to the global recovery.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner,
that tax cheat Obama hired, flies to
Europe on Tuesday for talks in Britain
and Germany on stabilizing the
continent's economy and financial
markets, said on Monday the global
economy had been strengthening faster
than expected.
At the
weekend, a senior U.S. Treasury
official, who declined to be identified,
had said the European crisis would have
minimal impact on the world economy.
China's state
planning commission seemed less
optimistic, saying on Monday that the
crisis would affect demand of Chinese
goods.
On Sunday,
Finance Minister Xie Xuren had warned
that Europe's debt woes could hit other
regions.
"At present,
risks from European sovereign debt have
increased factors of instability in the
course of global economic recovery," Xie
wrote an essay published in the
Washington Post and on his Ministry's
website (www.mof.gov.cn).
Some analysts
suggest China may delay letting its yuan
currency rise in value — as Washington
has urged — out of concern that its
exports to Europe will suffer.
"China is
unlikely to de-peg the yuan anytime
soon," Standard Chartered Bank said in a
note to clients.
Citing, among other factors, the need to
see some stabilization in global markets
and a sustained trade surplus, the bank
said Beijing is likely to wait until the
third quarter to unleash the yuan. It
had previously predicted May.
Japan's government also raised concerns,
saying in its monthly economic report
that attention should be paid to the
potential risks of a slowdown in
overseas economies, particularly in
Europe.
European leaders have sought to deal
with a crisis that has pushed many euro
zone member states' borrowing costs sky
high through a 110 billion euro bailout
of Greece and the setting up of a $1
trillion safety net to stabilize the
single currency. USA citizens, of
course, will be forced to support this
bailout of Europe's socialist nations.
If the trouble with European Socialism
starts -- and it remains an "if" -- the trigger may well
be obscure to the concerns of most Americans: a missed
budget projection by the Socialist Spanish government -
that stupidly championed an economically destructive
green environment, the failure of Socialist Greece to
hit a deficit-reduction target because of its greedy
free loading citizens, a drop in Ireland's economic
output.
But the knife-edge psychology currently governing global markets
has put the already questionable
future of the U.S.A's economic recovery in the
hands of socialist and socialist-influenced
politicians in an assortment of European capitals.
If one or more fail to make the expected progress on
cutting budgets, restructuring economies or boosting
growth, it could drain confidence in a broad and
unsettling way. Credit markets worldwide could lock
up and throw the global economy back into recession.
For the average American, that
seemingly distant sequence of the failures of
socialism could translate into another hit on the
401(k) plan, a lost factory shift if exports to
Europe decline and another shock to the banking
system that might make it even harder to borrow from
the USA's now nationalized banks.
"If what happened in socialist
Greece were to happen in a large socialist country,
it could fundamentally mark our times," Angelos
Pangratis, head of the European Union delegation to
the United States, said Friday after a panel
discussion on the crisis in Greece sponsored by the
Greater Washington Board of Trade.
That local economic development
boards are sponsoring panels on
government debt in Greece is perhaps proof
enough that Europe's problems are the world's. That
the dominoes can tumble fast was shown Thursday when
a new and narrowly drawn stock-trading policy in
Germany helped trigger a sell-off on Wall Street.
It marks a change, Barclays Capital chief
European economist Julian Callow wrote in a Friday
analysis, from a situation in which the bonds of
European countries were considered to carry
virtually zero risk to a "brave new world" where
sovereign default in one of the world's core
economic areas is a tangible threat.
Bank holdings of European debt are now being
studied with the same focus given to holdings of
U.S. mortgage-backed securities as the global
financial crisis unfolded in 2008 -- and with the
same suspicion that problems in one part of the
world could wreck others.
The most vulnerable European countries -- Greece,
Spain, Portugal and Ireland -- may represent only
about 4 percent of world economic activity, but "the
debt crisis and its ripple effects are bad news for
all corners of the world," said Cornell University
economist Eswar Prasad.
The risk of a worst-case scenario is
still considered remote. Socialist European
countries have pledged hundreds of billions of
dollars to aid indebted socialist neighbors that run
into trouble, and they say they are committed to
fixing the continent's larger economic problems. The
euro and U.S. markets were both higher Friday after
the German Parliament approved a key piece of that
support program. A renewed effort by the U.S.
Federal Reserve to ensure that European banks have
adequate access to dollars has generated little
demand -- a sign that a feared shortage of cash is
not in the offing.
USA banks are not heavily exposed to the weaker European countries,
Fed governor
Daniel K. Tarullo
said in testimony on
Capitol Hill last week.
Banks are in better
shape overall, after
fresh infusions of
capital. Meanwhile, the
U.S. economic recovery
has been strengthening
through the year, with
jobs added in five of
the last six months, and
recent consumer spending
and industrial output
stronger than most
forecasts.
But the
fallout from Europe
could still be widely
felt. U.S. trade
officials, hoping the
country can dramatically
boost its exports, are
dismayed at the steep
drop in the value of the
euro -- which is around
$1.25, down from more
than $1.50 in November.
The decline makes
American goods more
expensive compared with
those produced in
Europe. The slide in the
common European currency
could also change the
way China and a host of
Asian countries approach
their currency policies,
possibly making them
less likely to agree
with U.S. demands to
raise the value of their
money. If they raised
it, Asian goods would
become more expensive in
world markets, making it
easier for U.S. products
to compete.
The
connections are being
closely watched.
Analysts are studying
how the involvement of
Greek financial
institutions in Eastern
Europe, or Spanish banks
in Latin America, could
affect those economies.
The International
Monetary Fund and E.U.
officials are doing
biweekly checks on
Greece's progress to
ensure its economic
reform program stays on
track, according to
Vassilis Kaskarelis,
Greece's ambassador to
the United States.
Inside
the euro zone, banks are
intimately linked, with
a web of investments and
cross-country bond
holdings that could be a
main vector for
financial "contagion,"
with a default in one
country weakening banks
elsewhere.
There
are some positive
impacts in all this for
the United States.
For one,
uncertainty about
European government debt
has driven global
investors toward U.S.
government bonds, which
in turn is pushing down
long-term interest
rates. The 10-year
Treasury bond had a rate
of 3.2 percent Friday
compared with nearly 4
percent last month.
Those lower rates should
flow through to private
borrowing, helping
Americans getting
mortgages or businesses
looking to grow.
The
European panic is also
lowering the price of
oil and other
commodities on global
markets, potentially
making it cheaper for
Americans to fuel their
cars and heat their
homes. A barrel of oil
went for about $70 on
Friday, down from almost
$87 on April 6.
A final
positive for the U.S.
economy is that the
stronger dollar will
help keep inflation in
check by reducing the
cost of imports. That,
combined with renewed
worry about the strength
of the recovery, is
likely to give the Fed
some leeway to delay
raising interest rates
above their current
extremely low levels
longer than it would
have otherwise.
The most
precise comparison is to
the East Asian financial
crisis that enveloped
Thailand, Indonesia,
South Korea and other
nations in 1997 and
1998. There were
widespread fears that
the crisis would damage
the U.S. economy,
including through a
financial contagion
effect. The Fed even cut
interest rates in the
fall of 1998 to try to
forestall a weakening in
U.S. growth.
But
there was little obvious
impact on the U.S.
economy, which grew 4.5
percent in 1997, 4.4
percent in 1998, and 4.8
percent in 1999.
Six weeks of vacation a year. Retirement at 53, or maybe 60.
Free college education. Thousands of euros for having a baby. Free health care.
Social justice for all.
The system known as the European welfare state was built after World
War II as the keystone of a shared prosperity meant to prevent future conflict.
Peace and social justice - paradise in Western Europe. But, generous
lifelong benefits have since become a defining feature of modern Europe.
Now the welfare state - cherished by many European socialists and free
loaders as an alternative to what they see as dog-eat-dog American capitalism -
is coming under its most serious threat in decades: Europe's sovereign debt
crisis. Margaret Thatcher was right. Eventually the socialist politicians
run out of other people's money to spend.
Deep budget cuts are under way across Europe. Although the first round is
focused mostly on government payrolls - the least politically explosive target -
welfare benefits are looking increasingly vulnerable.
"The current welfare state is unaffordable," said Uri Dadush, director of the
Carnegie Endowment's International Economics Program. "The crisis has made the
day of reckoning closer by several years in virtually all the industrial
countries."
Germany will decide next month just how to cut at least 3 billion euros
($3.75 billion) from the budget. The government is suggesting for the first time
that it could make fresh cuts to unemployment benefits that include giving
Germans under 50 about 60 percent of their last salary before taxes for up to a
year. That benefit itself emerged after cuts to an even more generous package
about five years ago.
"We have to adjust our social security systems in a way that they motivate
people to accept regular work and do not give counterproductive incentives,"
German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told news weekly Frankfurter
Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung on Saturday.
The uncertainty over the future of the welfare state is undermining the
continent's self-image at a time when other key elements of post-war European
identity are fraying.
Large-scale immigration from outside Europe is challenging the continent's
assumptions about its dedication to tolerance and liberty as countries move to
control individual clothing - the Islamic veil - in the name of freedom and
equality.
Deeply wary of military conflict, many nations now find themselves
nonetheless mired in Afghanistan on behalf of what was supposed to be a North
Atlantic alliance, shying away from wholesale pullout while doing their utmost
to keep troops from actual combat.
Demographers and economists began warning decades ago that social welfare was
doomed by the aging of Europe's baby boomers. Some governments had been trimming
and reforming, but now almost all are scrambling to close deficits in order to
prevent a wider collapse of confidence in the euro.
"We need to change, to adapt ... for the sake of the protection of our social
model," European Union Commissioner Joaquin Almunia of Spain told reporters in
Stockholm Thursday.
The move is risky: experts warn the cuts could undermine the growth needed to
pull budgets back on a sustainable path.
On Monday, Britain unveils 6 billion pounds ($8.6 billion) in cuts - mostly
to government payrolls and expenses. The government has promised to raise the
age at which citizens receive a state pension - up from 60 to 65 for women, and
from 65 to 66 for men. It also plans to toughen the welfare regime, requiring
the unemployed to try to find jobs in order to collect benefits.
Britain says it will limit child tax credits and scrap a 250-pound ($360)
payment to the families of every newborn. Ministers are reviewing the long-term
affordability of the country's generous public sector pensions.
Funding for Britain's nationalized health care service will be protected
under the new government, however, and should rise each year to 2015.
France's conservative government is focusing on raising the retirement age.
Many workers can now retire at 60 with 50 percent of their average salary. Extra
funds are available for retired civil servants, those with three or more
children, military veterans and others.
A parliamentary debate is planned for September. Unions in France are
organizing a national day of protest marches and strikes on Thursday to demand
protection of wages and the retirement age.
In Spain, billions in cuts to state salaries go into effect next month, and
the Socialist government has frozen increases in pensions meant to compensate
for inflation for at least two years.
"They've hit us really hard," said Federico Carbonero, 92, a retired soldier.
He said he was unlikely to live long enough to see the worst of the pension
freeze, but had no doubts he would have to start relying on savings to maintain
his lifestyle.
Spain is cutting assistance payments for disabled people by 300 million euros
($375 million) and did away with a three-year-old bonus of 2,500 euros
($3,124.25) per new baby. It also has proposed hiking the retirement age for men
from 65 to 67.
Countries in northern Europe have done a far better of reforming social
welfare and have unemployment systems that focus on re-employing people instead
of making their unemployment comfortable, said Gayle Allard, a professor of
economic environment and country analysis at the Instituto de Empresa in Madrid.
Denmark and other Nordic countries are known for the world's highest taxes
and most generous cradle-to-grave benefits. Denmark has implemented a system
known broadly as "flexicurity," which combines flexibility for employers to hire
and fire workers with financial security and training to prepare for new jobs.
Denmark had a 7.5 percent unemployment rate in the first quarter of this
year, well below the EU average of 9.6 percent. Swedish and Finnish unemployment
stood at 8.9 percent. Norway, with some of the world's most generous
unemployment benefits fully funded by oil for the forseeable future, has
Europe's lowest jobless rate, just 3 percent in April.
Southern European countries that have not moved toward reforming welfare in
the same ways are paying a steep price.
After sharp cutbacks imposed as the condition of an international bailout
this month, Greeks must now contribute to pension funds for 40 instead of 37
years before retiring, and the age of early retirement is set to 60 at the
earliest.
Civil servants with monthly salaries of above 3,000 euros ($3,750) will lose
two extra months of salary - one paid at Christmas, the other split between
Easter and summer vacation.
In Portugal, seen as another potential candidate for bailout, the government
is focusing on hikes in income, corporate and sales taxes and has avoided
drastic changes to welfare entitlements. Unemployment benefits will be cut
somewhat and the out-of-work will have to accept any job paying more than 10
percent more than what they would receive in unemployment benefits.
The government is also stepping up checks on welfare claims, freezing public
sector pay and slicing public investment.
"There's been a lack of willingness to shift away from welfare as purely
social protection towards an approach which has been in much of northern Europe
in recent years, which is welfare as social investment," said Iain Begg, a
professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science's European
Institute.
Otto Fricke, a budget expert for the Free Democrats, the coalition partner of
German Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union, told The
Associated Press that no decisions on cuts have been made, but everything is on
the table except education, pension funds and financial aid to developing
countries. At least one high-ranking CDU member has called for the idea of
protecting education to be re-examined, however.
German public education, which was virtually free until 2005, when some of
Germany's 16 states started charging tuition fees of 1000 euros ($1,250) a year.
Virtually all Germany's students pay that much or less to attend state-funded
universities, including elite institutions. Education isn't as cheap elsewhere
in Europe but the 3,290 pounds ($4,720) per year paid by British students at
Cambridge is still far less than Americans pay at comparable schools like
Harvard, where annual tuition comes in just shy of $35,000.
The idea of cutting education is proving hard to swallow in the face of
Germany's promise to contribute up to 147.6 billion euros ($184.5 billion) in
loan guarantees to protect Greece and other countries that use the euro from
bankruptcy.
"I am worried that this crisis will also affect me on a personal level, for
example, that universities in Germany will raise the tuition in order to pay the
loan they give to Greece," said Karoline Daederich, a 22-year-old university
student from Berlin.
France
poised to reject socialist disasters,
starting with raising the retirement age
May 23 2010 21:29
Many expect France to begin to roll back the socialist prograns
that have eaten away at that nation's
ability to thrive and, even, survive.
France may be set to remove the absurd
right to retire at 60, as it embarks on
a contentious reform of its debt-laden
socialist pension system and brings
taxpayer support government finances
back into line.
Christian
Estrosi, France's industry minister,
said on Sunday the government was
“leaning towards an increase in the
[retirement] age” in its talks with the
socialist unions and employers’
federations, despite denials from some
socialist cabinet ministers over the
weekend of any decision being taken.
All but one of France’s five socialist unions have rejected
suggestions that the retirement age
should be increased. All these
socialists believe other taxpaying
citizens should pay more to fill a
deficit expected to hit 32 billion Euros
this year and as much as €45bn in 2020
and possibly more than €100bn in 2050.
The government has long
been highly sensitive to the potential
of pension reform sparking widespread
unrest among the union socialists and
their violent goons, The
government will be watching Thursday’s
socialist protest closely. Former prime
minister Alain Juppé was eventually
brought down by national protests in
1995 when he attempted to restructure
one of the most generous socialist
pensions systems in Europe.
However, there are signs
of opinion shifting and the government
may be hoping to take the opportunity
presented by the
Greek crisis to convince the public
of the need for reform. A survey last
week showed two-thirds of those
questioned believed the pension system
was in danger of collapse.
A similar percentage of
respondents agreed that the retirement
age needed to be raised from 60 to 62.
The SEIU sent nearly
500 of its members to swarm over the home of a Bank of America lawyer.. The SEIU
gathered at the house and terrified the teen age son of the lawyer. SEIU
management told their members this would be an effective way to force Bank of
America to stop foreclosing on homes. What do you think? Should you wait until
the SEIU or other goons are on your doorstep? Should you wait until enraged
illegal alien supporters start vandalizing your home or place of business?
Should you just hope the big government goons do not come after you?
Source and more
information:
Useless old people will, never, on their own, agree to
die. This is why the Health Care Reform plan sets up panels of experts to
decide what old people ailments, if any, are worth the cost to cure or improve.
ROME, May 19, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com)
In one region of Belgium, over 30 percent of reported euthanasia cases were
carried out without the consent of the patient, a
study has found. At the same time, the overall number of official reported
deaths by euthanasia are dramatically increasing in the country since the
practice was legalized in 2002, with 40 per cent more cases reported for 2009
than the previous year.
A team of Belgian and Dutch end-of-life researchers circulated
a questionnaire to physicians who signed death certificates of patients who died
in the Belgian region of Flanders between June and November 2007. The study
showed that of the 208 reported Flemish deaths involving the use of life-ending
drugs, 142 were killed with an explicit patient request, and 66 were without an
explicit request.
The study, published in
the Canadian Medical Association Journal this week, showed that in the majority
of cases of euthanasia without a patients consent, the euthanasia option was not
discussed with them before they were killed, and that most were undergoing
medical treatment with the hope of a cure for their illness.
The researchers noted that euthanasia and assisted suicide
mostly involved patients less than 80 years of age, those with cancer and those
dying at home. Euthanasia without a specific request from the patient was mostly
carried out on patients over 80 years, those with a disease other than cancer
and those in hospital.
In most cases of patients killed without an explicit request
(77.9%), the decision was not discussed with the patient.
Many cases in which patients were killed without requesting
euthanasia, the researchers said, involved patients whose diseases had
unpredictable end-of-life trajectories, with death not being an inevitable
result.
The Belgian governments statistics show that the number of
euthanasia cases is rising dramatically, with 700 cases in 2009 compared to 500
in 2008. It is likely, moreover, that the actual numbers of people being
euthanized with or without their consent is likely much higher than the official
statistics. Belgian media reports that physicians are hesitating to report
euthanasia for fear of judicial problems, with an estimated 1 in 4 actually
making formal reports of euthanasia.
In countries, such as the U.S., Canada and the UK, where the
possibility of legalizing assisted suicide or euthanasia continues to be debated
in legislatures, advocates of the practice routinely cite the safeguards that
are ostensibly built into the law to protect vulnerable patients. In Belgium,
while the law allows euthanasia for people without terminal illnesses and who
are suffering from constant and unbearable physical or psychological pain, it
also technically requires a patients written consent, the opinion of a third
physician in cases where an illness is not terminal and a one-month waiting
period for patients suffering from depression.
However, a study of cases of euthanasia in patients homes that was conducted by
researchers from the End-of-Life Care Research Group, and Belgian Department of
Public Health and found that, Procedural requirements such as consultation of a
second physician were sometimes ignored.
Euthanasia cases were least often reported when the physician
did not regard the decision as euthanasia, when only opioids were used to
perform euthanasia, or when no second physician was consulted.
Anti-euthanasia campaigners have long warned that legal
safeguards in practice do little to guard the safety of vulnerable patients. It
has been widely reported, and admitted by euthanasia campaigners, that
euthanasia was legalized in the Netherlands after years of physicians killing
patients without a law and simply not reporting the cause of death.
Bioethics writer and lawyer Wesley J. Smith, writing on his
blog at First Things magazine, said that it is likely that in countries that
have legalized euthanasia by this backdoor means physicians are killing patients
on their own cognizance without regard to legal restraints.
In reference to the recent study, Smith wrote, "We could say
Flemish doctors murdered their patients since explicit request is required under
the supposedly 'protective' euthanasia guidelines.
Smith also points to the next logical step in the euthanasia
business, the linking of euthanasia and organ harvesting.
He cites a letter to the editor of the journal
Transplantation, dated 2008, that recorded a case of a legal euthanasia, and
subsequent harvesting of organs, of a patient with locked-in syndrome, in which
she was fully conscious but completely paralyzed, and who requested that she be
killed. But before she died, she also decided to donate her organs.
The letter, from the physicians presiding over the case, said,
This case of two separate requests, first euthanasia and second, organ donation
after death, demonstrates that organ harvesting after euthanasia may be
considered and accepted from ethical, legal and practical viewpoints in
countries where euthanasia is legally accepted.
The ethical and legal possibility of combination of the two
separate processes, physician-assisted suicide and after-death organ donation
was then considered and agreed by the institutional ethical committee president.
Smith writes, If this doesnt set off alarm bells about how the
sick and disabled are increasingly being looked upon not only as burdens (to
themselves, families, and society), but potential objects for exploitation, what
will?
The killing of patients, even with consent, he wrote,
validates the ideas that dead is better than disabled and that living patients
can, essentially, be viewed as a natural resource to be killed and mined.
State's Rights are causing a problem. Now 1/3 of the USA States are
deciding to take action to protect themselves from immigrants without
documents. THIS MUST BE STOPPED. If States insist on State's Rights to use
police force to protect their citizens from immigrants, they could
assert State's Rights for other things.
17 States Now Filing Versions of Arizona's
Immigration Bill SB 1070
One of America's national organizations fighting against illegal
immigration is announcing that 17 states are now filing versions of Arizona's
SB 1070 law which is designed to help local police enforce America's existing
immigration laws.
Numerous national and local polls indicated that 60-81% of Americans support
local police enforcing immigration laws.
"Our national network of activists have been working overtime trying to help
the state of Arizona and the brave Arizonans who have passed this bill," said
William Gheen, President of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. "Arizona no
longer stands alone and we have now documented state lawmakers filing, or
announcing they will file, versions of the Arizona bill in seventeen states!
We will not stop until all states are protected from invasion as required by
the US Constitution."
ALIPAC has documented the following 17 states are following Arizona's lead in
response to citizen pressure.
ARKANSAS, IDAHO, INDIANA, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA,
NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA,
TEXAS, UTAH
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) has helped to pass some form of
immigration enforcement legislation in over 30 states, while the group has also
gained a national reputation for defeating legislation designed to give
licenses, in-state tuition, and other taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens in 20
states.
ALIPAC's President, William Gheen is a former campaign consultant, Legislative
Assistant, state lobbyist, and Assistant Sgt-At-Arms staffer in North Carolina
who has turned his local experiences into a political battle plan by driving
the national operations of ALIPAC.
"The Federal government has been hijacked by special interests that are
neglectful of their duties and even hostile towards the rightful citizens of
America," said William Gheen. "It is incumbent upon our states to protect
American lives, property, jobs, wages, security, and health, when the Executive
Branch fails to honor its Constitutional responsibility to do so by enforcing
our existing border and immigration laws."
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC lobbied state lawmakers and AZ Governor Jan
Brewer to pass SB 1070, which strictly prohibits racial profiling while
empowering local police officers to enforce immigration laws.
ALIPAC's activists have been working for almost four weeks now to encourage
state lawmakers across the nation to file versions of SB 1070, to help
alleviate boycotts and other political antagonism towards Arizona. Citizen
activist are being asked to call, e-mail, visit, and fax their state lawmakers
to encourage them to support existing SB 1070 type bills or to file them as
soon as possible.
For a list of the 17 states joining Arizona's push for this kind of
legislation, and to view the associated documentation, please visit our
tracking link for updated information at....
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196989.html
Be careful white racists. Our undocumented workers are
getting upset at your discrimination. Today it may be federal buildings.
Tomorrow they will join with their SEIU brothers outside your home.
An immigration rally that started outside the
Federal Building in Seattle got physical after more than 100 demonstrators moved
into a building that houses an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency office
and court.
The group, including Seattle City Councilman Larry Gossett and El Centro de La
Raza Executive Director Estela Ortega, locked arms during the noon hour Thursday
and blocked the elevators. When some people tried to get through the human
blockade, they were pushed away.
After that, the crowd moved back out to the street, where they sat in a circle
at the corner of Second Avenue and Madison Street. The group said they had no
plans to move and intended to be arrested.
They also promised a more aggressive and forceful Mob Rally in 2 weeks. If the
Tea Partiers had done this it would be Headline News in all the Media. Do you
think the Obama (lap dog) Media will report this? Of course they won't but if
they did they would justify it in some left wing way.
The birthers are all upset because of a few discrepancies in the various
social security numbers Obama has used. Some of the social security umbers
suggest he is about 23 years old. Others suggest Obama is over 100 years old.
I say, WHO CARES. Obama is President.
LOOK AS THIS BIRTHER NONSENSE.
URL Source:
http://hubpages.com/hub/Social-Secu ... -Belongs-to-Someone-119-Years-OLD Published: May 21, 2010
Author: vrajavala
Post Date: 2010-05-21 13:25:00 by JoeSnuffy
Social Security Number of Barack Hussein Obama Belongs to Someone 119 Years
Old
By vrajavala
What's next?
Scotland Yard detective uncovers Obowma's stolen SS numbers
Strange to Stranger
In the Santa Ana Federal Court of Judge David Carter, Dr. Orly Taitz,
Esq. has submitted an affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury by a licensed
Private Investigator, Susan Elizabeth Daniels. Not that I expect that case,
Keyes/Barnett v Obama, to go anywhere. For one thing, a "quo warranto" needs to
be bought in the District of Columbia to remove a federal officer, so Judge
Carter does not have "subject jurisdiction."
Also, from some of Judge
Carter's remarks, although I'm sure he a very honest and courageous judge, he
doesn't seem to have a good grasp of the original intent of the Founding
Fathers.
Now, the
social security number Ms. Daniels was able to uncover, of course was issued in
1939,to a person 49 years old, as that was the first year that those numbers
were issued. As many people know, the first three numbers indicate the
state in which the person obtained that Social Security Number.
Barack Obama's was issued in
Connecticut, between 1977and 1979. So, if he were born in 1961, then he would
have between the ages 16-18. Granted that little is known with certainty
about our "transparent" President. but the "official story" is that he was at
Panahou Academy in Hawaii during those years.
Okay. So, how can a guy in high school
in Hawaii get a fraudulent Social Security number of a dead person?
Remember one thing about Our Dear Leader: "the hand that rocks the cradle, rules
the World." Dr. Stanley
Ann Dunham, Obama's "alleged" mother, worked for the Ford Foundation, which has
very strong connections to the CIA .,
and it is sometimes
called the philanthropic front of the CIA,
and Dunham was "a poverty pimp", otherwise known as an agent for negotiating
'micro-economic loans' to impoverished people at exorbitant rates.
In fact, the social security number of Stanley Ann Dunham is also
alive and well, being used by several aliases, one of whom is "Kelly Dunham."
Speculation is that she is still alive and well, and may
be involved in money-laundering and real estate schemes. If she were
alive, she would only be 67, next month. I remember that, when Barry told the
school children last month that his Mother used to wake him at 4:30 AM, and I
thought that was a little strange. Like using sleep deprivation to brainwash
him. The question is
that why he's so attached to his Blackberry, the records for which would never
be available under FOIA?
My original post made it clear. Devious people are trying to pretend that
because Hitler, who was a national socialist, was diseased, Obama, another
socialist leader, must also be sexually diseased. All this stuff about Obama's
bad body odor and purple lips has nothing to do with Obama having a sexual
disease.
President Obama and other good socialist politicians, like Barney Frank and
Maxine Waters, realize that it is important to not overly regulate, or even look
too closely at Fannie and Freddie. These organizations help provide social
justice for those who cannot afford to buy and pay for homes in the Capitalist
sector.
The Senate Thursday evening passed a landmark financial regulation bill
that Democrats said would prevent future taxpayer-funded bailouts of
large Wall Street firms, but which Republicans said was a rushed and
overbearing measure that could do more harm than good.
The Senate passed the bill on a 59-39 vote, with four Republicans
joining Democrats in voting for it and two Democrats voting against it.
The bill will give the federal government new powers to take over
failing financial institutions and unwind them, require complicated
derivative trading to be routed through a central clearinghouse, and
create a massive new consumer protection agency.
The bill will now go to a conference committee so that it can be
reconciled with a version passed by the House last fall. Democrats want
to get the bill to President Obamas desk by July 4.
Democrats hailed the legislation.
It means that were finally going to put an end to the whole notion of
too big to fail. Youre never going to have to hear about taxpayers
bailing out Wall Street, said Sen. Mark Warner, Virginia Democrat, who
was a key player in crafting the bill.
Obama made a simple and firm promise: There will be no more
taxpayer-funded bailouts period.
But Republicans slammed the bill for doing nothing to fix the problem of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-owned failed mortgage
giants who have cost taxpayers $145 billion and are poised to hemorrhage
hundreds of billions more over the next few years.
Read more...
Some liberals may have misunderstood the orginal post. The post was meant to
show how devious some people were who were claiming Obama was sexually diseased.
The penalty for mocking Mohammed is death. I do not understand why any USA
citizen would not be toerant and accepting of the culture of Islam.
The following article shows how devious Obama's opponents have become. The
article is an obvious attempt to paint Obama as a sexually deviant socialist,
sufferring from a sexual transmitted disease, just like the national socialist,
Adolph Hitler. Just because one socialist leader had an STD does not mean all
socialist leaders have an STD.
Hitler's tremors and irregular heartbeat during the last
years of his life could have been symptoms of tertiary (late stage) syphilis,[1]
which would mean he had a syphilis infection for many years. Along with
another doctor, Theodor Morell diagnosed the symptoms as such by early
1945 in a joint report to SS head Heinrich Himmler.[citation
needed] Some historians[who?]
have also cited Hitler's preoccupation with syphilis across 14 pages of
Mein Kampf, where he called it a "Jewish[weasel words]
have been influenced by his anger at being a syphilitic, as well as his
belief that he had acquired the disease from undesirable societal elements
which he intended to eliminate.[citation
needed] In several chapters of Mein Kampf, he wrote about the
temptation of prostitution and the spreading of syphilis, specifically
volume 1, chapter 10 "Causes of the Collapse".[2]
Historians have speculated he may have[weasel words]
caught the affliction from a German prostitute at a time when the disease
was not yet treatable by modern antibiotics, which would also explain his avoidance of
normal sexual relations with women. However, syphilis had become curable in
1910 with Dr. Paul Ehrlich's introduction of the drug Salvarsan.[citation
needed] disease", leading to speculation he
may have had the disease himself. His possible discovery in 1908 that he
himself had the disease may have been responsible for his demeanor; while
his life course may
No pictures exist of Hitler
revealing any portion of his torso, such as wearing a bathing suit at the
beach.[citation
needed] The author Deborah Hayden[3]
has written extensively regarding Hitler and syphilis.[4][5]
Since the 1870s, however, it was a common rhetorical
practice on the völkisch right to associate Jews with diseases such as
syphilis.[citation
needed] Historian Robert Waite claims Hitler tested negative on a Wassermann test as late as 1939, which does not prove that
he did not have the disease, because the Wassermann test was prone to false-negative results.[citation
needed][citation
needed] Regardless of whether he actually had
syphilis or not, Hitler lived in constant fear of the disease, and took
treatment for it no matter what doctors told him.
In his biography of Doctor Felix Kersten called The Man with the Miraculous Hands,[6]
journalist and Académie française member Joseph Kessel wrote that in the winter of 1942, Kersten
heard of Hitler's medical condition. Consulted by his patient, Himmler, as
to whether he could "assist a man who suffers from severe headaches,
dizziness and insomnia," Kersten was shown a top-secret 26-page report. It
detailed how Hitler had contracted syphilis in his youth and was treated
for it at a hospital in Pasewalk, Germany. However, in 1937, symptoms re-appeared, showing
that the disease was still active, and by the start of 1942, signs were
evident that progressive syphilitic paralysis (Tabes
dorsalis) was occurring. Himmler advised Kersten that Morell (who in the 1930s claimed to be a specialist venereologist) was in charge of Hitler's treatment, and
that it was a state secret. The book also relates how Kersten learned from
Himmler's secretary, Rudolf Brandt, that at that time, probably the only other
people privy to the report's information were Nazi Party chairman Martin Bormann and Hermann Göring, the head of the Luftwaffe.
Many "liberal" democrats support marriage between men and men. Many support
marriage between women and women. Liberal democrats also realize we should
sanctify marriage between men and six year old girls. Why does everyone have to
live by the extremists religious views of you Christians and Jews?
Rip
I know you are an intelligent conservative. BUT, posts like yopur explain
why so many hate you. All of your information may be true, but it is
information that does not help our government make progress. All socialists
(liberal and progressive Democrats) know that social justice must not stop at
the border.
Ponyztail is correct, although she uses derogatory words.
People who work and are greedy accumulate personal weath. These merchants
of greed prefer a free market, so they can take advantage of those with less
energy and less intelligence.
People who must stay at the bottom of the Capitalist's pile of humanity
need government help to achieve social justice. Social Justice allows the less
energetic and less intelligent to have the things others have to worked for by
simply filling out a government form.
Chisna
Do not demean this attempt to disarm violent USA citizens. The archaic
Constitution gets in the way of attempts by progressive democratic politicians
to disarm the USA. But, the Constitution also requires us to abide by treaties
the President signs. We can avoid the Constitution's Right to Bear Arms, by
using the Constitution's delegation of responsibility to the President, for
signing treaties.
Obama inherited Bush's mess. It was Bush who spent too much. To achieve a
new economic stateof equilibrium, Obama has been forced to spend even more than
Bush. But, unlike Bush, Obama's spending is to help achieve social justice, a
more efficient federal government better able to take care of us, and
socialism's goal of redistributing the wealth from those who produce it to those
who need to use it.
Let's discuss socialism and social justice. I know we have man
intelligent liberal democrats here who support socialism and social
justice, although some do not like to admit it. Join me as we discuss
the inevitably of socialism and the joys of social justice.
I know there are intelligent conservatives here who prefer the "free
market" (capitalism) and individual freedom over socialism and
collective social justice. Join me so we can intelligently discuss our
positions.
I also know we have many posters here - paid by Republicans to act
like ignorant democrats. I ask you to join this discussion, if you can
control yourself and not behave like idiot democrats. We all know you
are paid by Republicans to act like idiots.
Would someone like to provide a definition of socialism?
I agree with you. Many of my liberal democratic friends are, like
Obama, afraid to admit to being socialists. There are only 70 members
of Congress who are willing to admit they are socialists. This is sad,
but I understand the fear of my liberal democrat friends. In the USA we
have been taught that "socialism" is a bad word and "capitalism" is a
good word. Obviously politicians like President Obama need to deceive
the voters. I am, however, sad that LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WILL NOT STAND UP
AND SPEAK OUT FOR SOCIALISM.
Do Republicans pay you to pretend you are an idiot democrat?
Holly
The conservatives are always arguing just like you. Let's not have affirmative action, blacks and minorities can make
it on their own. Let's not have health care reform that provides preferences for
minorties, blacks and minorities do not need more health care services
than white people.
Republcians always have a reason why they oppose preferential
treatments for minorities. Your idea that most minorites can make it on
their own - without help from government - is absurd and flies in the
face of all the civil right gains made by minorities.
Woody Allen said it and Mr. Allen is right. Obama should be a dictator.
Obama has been too easy on his opponents. Hitler, Stalin and Mao
would never have tolerated the tea party people's sedition. Those who
oppose Obama, socialist democrats and the federal government are
traitors. The penalty for sedition is death. As dictator Obama could
do more to silence the seditionists.
I could not believe my ears. Glenn Beck will have a show tonight
devoted to Social Justice. He will also discuss economic justice and
ecological justice. Glenn has finally gotten the message. Social
justice is God's Way. All believers in God MUST fight for social
justice.
Capitalists should not own any valuable resources. They should not own
oil rigs, oil drilling equipment, coal mines, steel factories,
automoblie factories, farms or food prcessing technology. Certainly
they should not be allowed to control the methods of mass
communication. All of these valuable resources belong to the federal
government. The federal government will efficiently run these things
for the betterment of our lives. Only the federal government has the
power, might and collective wisdom to assure social justice for all.
Be careful white racists. Our undocumented workers are getting
upset at your discrimination. Today it may be federal buildings. Tomorrow
they will join with their SEIU brothers outside your home.
An immigration rally that started
outside the Federal Building in Seattle got physical after more than 100
demonstrators moved into a building that houses an Immigration and Customs
Enforcement agency office and court.
The group, including Seattle City Councilman Larry Gossett and El Centro de La
Raza Executive Director Estela Ortega, locked arms during the noon hour Thursday
and blocked the elevators. When some people tried to get through the human
blockade, they were pushed away.
After that, the crowd moved back out to the street, where they sat in a circle
at the corner of Second Avenue and Madison Street. The group said they had no
plans to move and intended to be arrested.
They also promised a more aggressive and forceful Mob Rally in 2 weeks. If the
Tea Partiers had done this it would be Headline News in all the Media. Do you
think the Obama (lap dog) Media will report this? Of course they won't but if
they did they would justify it in some left wing way.
The birthers are all upset because of a few discrepancies in the various
social security numbers Obama has used. Some of the social security umbers
suggest he is about 23 years old. Others suggest Obama is over 100 years old.
I say, WHO CARES. Obama is President.
LOOK AS THIS BIRTHER NONSENSE.
URL Source:
http://hubpages.com/hub/Social-Secu ... -Belongs-to-Someone-119-Years-OLD Published: May 21, 2010
Author: vrajavala
Post Date: 2010-05-21 13:25:00 by JoeSnuffy
Social Security Number of Barack Hussein Obama Belongs to Someone 119 Years
Old
By vrajavala
What's next?
Scotland Yard detective uncovers Obowma's stolen SS numbers
Strange to Stranger
In the Santa Ana Federal Court of Judge David Carter, Dr. Orly Taitz,
Esq. has submitted an affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury by a licensed
Private Investigator, Susan Elizabeth Daniels. Not that I expect that case,
Keyes/Barnett v Obama, to go anywhere. For one thing, a "quo warranto" needs to
be bought in the District of Columbia to remove a federal officer, so Judge
Carter does not have "subject jurisdiction."
Also, from some of Judge
Carter's remarks, although I'm sure he a very honest and courageous judge, he
doesn't seem to have a good grasp of the original intent of the Founding
Fathers.
Now, the
social security number Ms. Daniels was able to uncover, of course was issued in
1939,to a person 49 years old, as that was the first year that those numbers
were issued. As many people know, the first three numbers indicate the
state in which the person obtained that Social Security Number.
Barack Obama's was issued in
Connecticut, between 1977and 1979. So, if he were born in 1961, then he would
have between the ages 16-18. Granted that little is known with certainty
about our "transparent" President. but the "official story" is that he was at
Panahou Academy in Hawaii during those years.
Okay. So, how can a guy in high school
in Hawaii get a fraudulent Social Security number of a dead person?
Remember one thing about Our Dear Leader: "the hand that rocks the cradle, rules
the World." Dr. Stanley
Ann Dunham, Obama's "alleged" mother, worked for the Ford Foundation, which has
very strong connections to the CIA .,
and it is sometimes
called the philanthropic front of the CIA,
and Dunham was "a poverty pimp", otherwise known as an agent for negotiating
'micro-economic loans' to impoverished people at exorbitant rates.
In fact, the social security number of Stanley Ann Dunham is also
alive and well, being used by several aliases, one of whom is "Kelly Dunham."
Speculation is that she is still alive and well, and may
be involved in money-laundering and real estate schemes. If she were
alive, she would only be 67, next month. I remember that, when Barry told the
school children last month that his Mother used to wake him at 4:30 AM, and I
thought that was a little strange. Like using sleep deprivation to brainwash
him. The question is
that why he's so attached to his Blackberry, the records for which would never
be available under FOIA?
My original post made it clear. Devious people are trying to pretend that
because Hitler, who was a national socialist, was diseased, Obama, another
socialist leader, must also be sexually diseased. All this stuff about Obama's
bad body odor and purple lips has nothing to do with Obama having a sexual
disease.
President Obama and other good socialist politicians, like Barney Frank and
Maxine Waters, realize that it is important to not overly regulate, or even look
too closely at Fannie and Freddie. These organizations help provide social
justice for those who cannot afford to buy and pay for homes in the Capitalist
sector.
The Senate Thursday evening passed a landmark financial regulation bill
that Democrats said would prevent future taxpayer-funded bailouts of
large Wall Street firms, but which Republicans said was a rushed and
overbearing measure that could do more harm than good.
The Senate passed the bill on a 59-39 vote, with four Republicans
joining Democrats in voting for it and two Democrats voting against it.
The bill will give the federal government new powers to take over
failing financial institutions and unwind them, require complicated
derivative trading to be routed through a central clearinghouse, and
create a massive new consumer protection agency.
The bill will now go to a conference committee so that it can be
reconciled with a version passed by the House last fall. Democrats want
to get the bill to President Obamas desk by July 4.
Democrats hailed the legislation.
It means that were finally going to put an end to the whole notion of
too big to fail. Youre never going to have to hear about taxpayers
bailing out Wall Street, said Sen. Mark Warner, Virginia Democrat, who
was a key player in crafting the bill.
Obama made a simple and firm promise: There will be no more
taxpayer-funded bailouts period.
But Republicans slammed the bill for doing nothing to fix the problem of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-owned failed mortgage
giants who have cost taxpayers $145 billion and are poised to hemorrhage
hundreds of billions more over the next few years.
Read more...
Some liberals may have misunderstood the orginal post. The post was meant to
show how devious some people were who were claiming Obama was sexually diseased.
The penalty for mocking Mohammed is death. I do not understand why any USA
citizen would not be toerant and accepting of the culture of Islam.
The following article shows how devious Obama's opponents have become. The
article is an obvious attempt to paint Obama as a sexually deviant socialist,
sufferring from a sexual transmitted disease, just like the national socialist,
Adolph Hitler. Just because one socialist leader had an STD does not mean all
socialist leaders have an STD.
Hitler's tremors and irregular heartbeat during the last
years of his life could have been symptoms of tertiary (late stage) syphilis,[1]
which would mean he had a syphilis infection for many years. Along with
another doctor, Theodor Morell diagnosed the symptoms as such by early
1945 in a joint report to SS head Heinrich Himmler.[citation
needed] Some historians[who?]
have also cited Hitler's preoccupation with syphilis across 14 pages of
Mein Kampf, where he called it a "Jewish[weasel words]
have been influenced by his anger at being a syphilitic, as well as his
belief that he had acquired the disease from undesirable societal elements
which he intended to eliminate.[citation
needed] In several chapters of Mein Kampf, he wrote about the
temptation of prostitution and the spreading of syphilis, specifically
volume 1, chapter 10 "Causes of the Collapse".[2]
Historians have speculated he may have[weasel words]
caught the affliction from a German prostitute at a time when the disease
was not yet treatable by modern antibiotics, which would also explain his avoidance of
normal sexual relations with women. However, syphilis had become curable in
1910 with Dr. Paul Ehrlich's introduction of the drug Salvarsan.[citation
needed] disease", leading to speculation he
may have had the disease himself. His possible discovery in 1908 that he
himself had the disease may have been responsible for his demeanor; while
his life course may
No pictures exist of Hitler
revealing any portion of his torso, such as wearing a bathing suit at the
beach.[citation
needed] The author Deborah Hayden[3]
has written extensively regarding Hitler and syphilis.[4][5]
Since the 1870s, however, it was a common rhetorical
practice on the völkisch right to associate Jews with diseases such as
syphilis.[citation
needed] Historian Robert Waite claims Hitler tested negative on a Wassermann test as late as 1939, which does not prove that
he did not have the disease, because the Wassermann test was prone to false-negative results.[citation
needed][citation
needed] Regardless of whether he actually had
syphilis or not, Hitler lived in constant fear of the disease, and took
treatment for it no matter what doctors told him.
In his biography of Doctor Felix Kersten called The Man with the Miraculous Hands,[6]
journalist and Académie française member Joseph Kessel wrote that in the winter of 1942, Kersten
heard of Hitler's medical condition. Consulted by his patient, Himmler, as
to whether he could "assist a man who suffers from severe headaches,
dizziness and insomnia," Kersten was shown a top-secret 26-page report. It
detailed how Hitler had contracted syphilis in his youth and was treated
for it at a hospital in Pasewalk, Germany. However, in 1937, symptoms re-appeared, showing
that the disease was still active, and by the start of 1942, signs were
evident that progressive syphilitic paralysis (Tabes
dorsalis) was occurring. Himmler advised Kersten that Morell (who in the 1930s claimed to be a specialist venereologist) was in charge of Hitler's treatment, and
that it was a state secret. The book also relates how Kersten learned from
Himmler's secretary, Rudolf Brandt, that at that time, probably the only other
people privy to the report's information were Nazi Party chairman Martin Bormann and Hermann Göring, the head of the Luftwaffe.
Many "liberal" democrats support marriage between men and men. Many support
marriage between women and women. Liberal democrats also realize we should
sanctify marriage between men and six year old girls. Why does everyone have to
live by the extremists religious views of you Christians and Jews?
Rip
I know you are an intelligent conservative. BUT, posts like yopur explain
why so many hate you. All of your information may be true, but it is
information that does not help our government make progress. All socialists
(liberal and progressive Democrats) know that social justice must not stop at
the border.
Ponyztail is correct, although she uses derogatory words.
People who work and are greedy accumulate personal weath. These merchants
of greed prefer a free market, so they can take advantage of those with less
energy and less intelligence.
People who must stay at the bottom of the Capitalist's pile of humanity
need government help to achieve social justice. Social Justice allows the less
energetic and less intelligent to have the things others have to worked for by
simply filling out a government form.
Chisna
Do not demean this attempt to disarm violent USA citizens. The archaic
Constitution gets in the way of attempts by progressive democratic politicians
to disarm the USA. But, the Constitution also requires us to abide by treaties
the President signs. We can avoid the Constitution's Right to Bear Arms, by
using the Constitution's delegation of responsibility to the President, for
signing treaties.
Obama inherited Bush's mess. It was Bush who spent too much. To achieve a
new economic state of equilibrium, Obama has been forced to spend even more
than Bush. But, unlike Bush, Obama's spending is to help achieve social
justice, a more efficient federal government better able to take care of us, and
socialism's goal of redistributing the wealth from those who produce it to those
who need to use it.
Let's discuss socialism and social justice. I know we have man
intelligent liberal democrats here who support socialism and social
justice, although some do not like to admit it. Join me as we discuss
the inevitably of socialism and the joys of social justice.
I know there are intelligent conservatives here who prefer the "free
market" (capitalism) and individual freedom over socialism and
collective social justice. Join me so we can intelligently discuss our
positions.
I also know we have many posters here - paid by Republicans to act
like ignorant democrats. I ask you to join this discussion, if you can
control yourself and not behave like idiot democrats. We all know you
are paid by Republicans to act like idiots.
Would someone like to provide a definition of socialism?
Many of my liberal democratic friends are, like
Obama, afraid to admit to being socialists. There are only 70 members
of Congress who are willing to admit they are socialists. This is sad,
but I understand the fear of my liberal democrat friends. In the USA we
have been taught that "socialism" is a bad word and "capitalism" is a
good word. Obviously politicians like President Obama need to deceive
the voters. I am, however, sad that LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WILL NOT STAND UP
AND SPEAK OUT FOR SOCIALISM.
Do Republicans pay you to pretend you are an idiot democrat?
The conservatives are always arguing . Let's not have affirmative action, blacks and minorities can make
it on their own. Let's not have health care reform that provides preferences for
minorities, blacks and minorities do not need more health care services
than white people.
Republicans always have a reason why they oppose preferential
treatments for minorities. Their idea that most minorities can make it
on their own - without help from government - is absurd and flies in the
face of all the civil right gains made by minorities.
Woody Allen said it and Mr. Allen is right. Obama should be a dictator.
Obama has been too easy on his opponents. Hitler, Stalin and Mao
would never have tolerated the tea party people's sedition. Those who
oppose Obama, socialist democrats and the federal government are
traitors. The penalty for sedition is death. As dictator Obama could
do more to silence the seditionists.
I could not believe my ears. Glenn Beck will have
a show tonight devoted to Social Justice. He will also discuss economic
justice and ecological justice. Glenn has finally gotten the message.
Social justice is God's Way. All believers in God MUST fight for social
justice.
Capitalists should not own any valuable resources. They should not own
oil rigs, oil drilling equipment, coal mines, steel factories,
automoblie factories, farms or food processing technology. Certainly
they should not be allowed to control the methods of mass
communication. All of these valuable resources belong to the federal
government. The federal government will efficiently run these things
for the betterment of our lives. Only the federal government has the
power, might and collective wisdom to assure social justice for all.
A year ago those who feared Obama transforming the USA
into a socialist nation were considered crazy. Six months ago those who
discussed this issue laughed at their own conspiracy theories. For the past few
months those who discuss this are no longer laughing so much.
bruce
Many thanks for your post. I have started a website encouraging others to
do exactly what you have done in your neighborhood. I will use the inforamtion
you provided and would appreciate any other information like this that you may
have. I completely agree with you that the action we want now is POLITICAL
action. But I also think more people need to get prepared as you and your
neighbors have.
Bruce wrote>>>>>
I am a co-leader of a neighborhood militia. We are heavily armed and have
had discussions as to when and how to defend our homes, families and
neighborhood. It is not an easy task to come up with an action plan.
Basically, where I am currently, the local authorities are unreliable at
deterring violent crime. Just recently a home invasion ended up with the beating
of an elderly woman and her husband's death. Police will tell you they are able
to investigate your murder but are unable to prevent it. So it is imperative
that you be armed and know your state and local laws.
In most areas your residence is your castle and you are allowed to be
armed on your property. I carry openly when at home, with a loaded magazine, but
never any cartridge in the chamber. As long as I do not flash my gun or threaten
anyone at the door, it is perfectly legal. When I go out, being in California,
I cannot carry a concealed sidearm. Carrying an unloaded weapon is legal openly
but pointless and invites harassment from over zealous police in my opinion, so
I don't bother. Instead I carry a 5 inch quick draw blade made by Benchmark
(my favorite but by no means the only option). As long as it is visible and
not concealed, it is legal.
Our militia does everything legal and we have a good relationship with the
local police. Many of us, including myself have taken CERT classes and are
known by officers as local disaster responders. Two in our group have trained
search and rescue dogs also.
So Boomer, if I were in the same position as the homeowner you speak of, I
would have had cause and ability to draw my firearm, but would never use it
unless my life or other lives were threatened. It is not time for war, it is
time to fight politically. Contribute to the best challenging candidates with
money or time, and throw the incumbent bums out.
I know "liberal" and "progressive" democrats are socialists. I know
socialists are liars. I know socialists are often the most useless and ignorant
dregs of society. I know "liberals" can be very violent and mean-spirited.
Still, I am surprised to find even the most mentally ill liberals are supporting
500 SEIU goons terrorizing a teenager in his own home.
The big drop in the Dow was caused by fears the the socialist
politicians and policies in Europe have essentially bankrupted Europe. Jim
Cramer says the European economy could collapse in 48 hours. Jim says that if
Europe survives the next 48 hours it will be OK for a little bit longer.
You and your neighbors (or
coworkers) must determine what the laws allow you to do to protect yourself,
your family, your neighbors, your property and your coworkers or employees.
What can you legally do in your state and city or town. Can homeowners or
business owners shoot trespassers? Can neighbors? Will the police lock up
trespassers or rioters? Can mobs use bull horns and other actions to disturb the
peace and terrorize people in your neighborhood? Who are the neighbors and
coworkers who can most quickly react, with or without weapons, to fight off the
invaders? People need to get together with their neighbors and coworkers to
decide how to deal with armies of big government goons or rioters for illegal
aliens - before the riots and before the goons arrive at your home.
Some may feel this is NOT required. Liberals
and progressives and even their goons tend to be cowards. A homeowner with a gun
will send the SEIU goons and the illegal alien supporting rioters running. A
shot in the air will terrorize these terrorists.
But, we must fear that if we react like this - without researching what we
can legally do - problems could occur. Actions like this, EVEN IF LEGAL - will
make the socialist democrats and their media pals scream to disarm people. We
need to make sure that whatever actions we take are legal in our states and
localities.
I am not sure what you say is completely true in all states and localities - or
how local laws are applied. For example - in some courts it has been ruled that
you need to first try to runaway from the goons before using a weapon.
Jim Kramer, a well known financial analyst on TV, feels that the European
socialist economies could collapse in 48 hours. The good news is that Mr. Kramer
feels - if Europe's socialists get past the next 48 hours - it will survive - at
least for a little more time.
I know many socialist (liberal) democrats are extremely stupid. I will try to
make this simple - even for the "progressive" socialists who support riots for
illegal aliens and attacks on neighborhoods in the name of socialism. It is not
acceptable for socialist storm troopers to terrorize people in their homes and
at work.
Planet earth has no borders. It is the capitalists who have always created
borders - to set aside the people they feel they could exploit and enslave.
Socialists know there is but one planet earth. We are all passengers, together.
What is yours is mine. What is mine is yours.
Our world teeters on the brink of disaster. Ocean current loops are spreading
the oil spill everywhere. Global warming is causing volcanoes and earthquakes.
We either take action now or we shall surely bring about a worldwide
catastrophe.
Obama supports all of the world's citizens, not just USA citizens.
Obama is a man of peace, a man who knows world governance means social justice.
He knows a world without borders is a world in which wealth can be more easily
distributed from the productive to the less productive. Click here to learn more
about Obama saying to Calderon: "We are Not Defined by Our Borders"...
I wonder how Glenn Beck will feel when 100 SEIU members show up on his lawn?
